ConductAtlas › Compare › AI / Automated Decision-Making
Cross-platform comparison

AI / Automated Decision-Making, Cross-Platform Comparison

211 platforms tracked · 810 provisions · Compare how platforms differ on this clause type.

211
Platforms
343
Total monitored
Stay ahead of the changes

Track clause changes

Get alerts when any platform updates this clause.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the weekly letter, free
Compare platforms side by side
Select 2 to 4 platforms. Comparison shows clause text, consumer impact, and AI-generated difference analysis.
Comparing OpenAI vs Google-Gemini · AI / Automated Decision-Making provisions
← Back to full comparison

Compare ai / automated decision-making governance provisions between OpenAI and Google-Gemini. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents.

ai OpenAI No Use of Personal Output for High-Stakes Decisions
What it means
This prohibition limits the use of AI-generated Output in high-stakes decisions that directly affect individuals' legal rights or material circumstances, reducing the risk of harm from automated or AI-assisted determinations.
Consumer impact
Users are prohibited from applying Output about a person to any purpose that could have a legal or material impact on that person, including the listed categories of decisions.
Opt-out available
No opt-out available
Actual clause text
You must not use any Output relating to a person for any purpose that could have a legal or material impact on that person, such as making credit, educational, employment, housing, insurance...
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
CA-P-059328
Recent changes

OpenAI updated its Service Terms to add a new subsection on Prompt-to-Voice, a feature that generat…

Sep 30, 2026 Medium

OpenAI added two new sections to its Service Terms: Section 14 on Dots and Agentic Features, which …

OpenAI added a new section to its Service Terms establishing disclaimers and limitations for its Fi…

Google-Gemini
No AI / Automated Decision-Making clause found in our archive for this platform.
AI Difference Analysis Insight
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.
Stay ahead of the changes

Insight only

See what this means with full AI difference analysis.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the weekly letter, free
Stay ahead of the changes

Don't miss the next change

Get alerts and full clause analysis when a tracked platform updates this provision. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the weekly letter, free
Stay ahead of the changes

Full clause analysis

Get alerts and full clause analysis for every tracked platform. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the weekly letter, free
Browse by provision type
Account Control Content Moderation Acceptable Use Restrictions Payment & Fees Refunds & Chargebacks Data Collection Data Usage Data Sharing Data Retention Privacy Rights Arbitration Legal Jurisdiction Liability Limitation Indemnification Platform Discretion Policy Changes Enforcement Actions Monetization Rules Developer / API Restrictions AI / Automated Decision-Making Restricted or Prohibited Content/Industries Disclosure and Transparency Requirements Targeting and Audience Restrictions Commission, Payout, and Attribution Terms Landing Page and Destination Requirements Intellectual Property General Contract Terms Export Controls & Sanctions Other