Compare ai / automated decision-making governance provisions between OpenAI and Google-Gemini. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents and classified by severity.
The clause creates a broad operational authorization for OpenAI to incorporate user content into service development and model improvement processes, while preserving user ownership and providing a mechanism to restrict training-specific uses.
Consumer impact
Users authorize OpenAI to use their submitted content for service provision and improvement by default upon submission. Users who wish to restrict use of their content for model training may opt out through their account settings, after which the license applies to other specified service functions but not to training operations.
Opt-out available
No opt-out available
Actual clause text
By using our Services, you provide us with information, including your inputs and how you interact with the Services ("Your Content"). You retain whatever rights you have in Your Content. By submitting Your Content to our Services, you grant OpenAI a license to use Your Content to provide, maintain, develop, and improve our Services. If you do not want OpenAI to use your Content to train models that improve our Services, you can opt out in your account settings.
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
No AI / Automated Decision-Making clause found in our archive for this platform.
AI Difference AnalysisProfessional
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.