Compare age restriction governance provisions between Uber and DoorDash. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents and classified by severity.
This provision establishes Uber's operational compliance framework with child protection requirements, defining the age restriction for service eligibility and creating a deletion obligation that responds to discovery of underage data collection.
Consumer impact
Users under 18 are not permitted to use Uber's services under these terms. If a user is identified as under 18, Uber will delete the personal data collected, subject to the deletion procedures and timeline the company implements.
Opt-out available
No opt-out available
Actual clause text
Uber's services are not directed to children under the age of 18. Uber does not knowingly collect personal data from children. If Uber learns that it has collected personal data from a child under 18, it will take steps to delete that data.
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
This provision establishes DoorDash's compliance framework with federal child privacy law and defines the operational restrictions on who may use the platform. It creates explicit requirements for parental involvement in account usage by minors and establishes a data deletion mechanism for non-compliant collections.
Consumer impact
Users under 13 cannot use DoorDash Services, and users between 13 and 17 must have a parent or guardian involved in account usage. If DoorDash discovers personal information from a child under 13 was collected without verified parental consent, the company will delete that information.
Opt-out available
No opt-out available
Actual clause text
The Services are not directed to children under the age of 13. We comply with the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA). If we learn we have collected or received personal information from a child under 13 without verification of parental consent, we will delete that information. If you are under 18, you may only use the Services with the involvement of a parent or guardian.
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
DoorDash removed the header line identifying the document's country and language jurisdiction (Coun…
AI Difference AnalysisProfessional
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.