ConductAtlas › Compare › Acceptable Use Restrictions
Cross-platform comparison

Acceptable Use Restrictions, Cross-Platform Comparison

273 platforms tracked · 3909 provisions · Compare how platforms differ on this clause type.

273
Platforms
343
Total monitored
Stay ahead of the changes

Track clause changes

Get alerts when any platform updates this clause.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the weekly letter, free
Compare platforms side by side
Select 2 to 4 platforms. Comparison shows clause text, consumer impact, and AI-generated difference analysis.
Comparing OpenAI vs Google-Gemini · Acceptable Use Restrictions provisions
← Back to full comparison

Compare acceptable use restrictions governance provisions between OpenAI and Google-Gemini. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents.

ai OpenAI Healthcare Output Independent Judgment Required
What it means
This requirement places the burden of verification and professional judgment on the user, limiting reliance on the output for clinical decision-making.
Consumer impact
If you use ChatGPT for Healthcare, you are required to independently verify its output and exercise professional judgment rather than relying primarily or solely on it for patient decisions.
Opt-out available
No opt-out available
Actual clause text
You should always verify the information provided by ChatGPT for Healthcare and exercise independent professional judgment in decision-making about a patient without relying primarily or solely on the output.
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
CA-P-064381
Recent changes

OpenAI updated its Service Terms to add a new subsection on Prompt-to-Voice, a feature that generat…

Sep 30, 2026 Medium

OpenAI added two new sections to its Service Terms: Section 14 on Dots and Agentic Features, which …

OpenAI added a new section to its Service Terms establishing disclaimers and limitations for its Fi…

Google-Gemini
No Acceptable Use Restrictions clause found in our archive for this platform.
AI Difference Analysis Insight
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.
Stay ahead of the changes

Insight only

See what this means with full AI difference analysis.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the weekly letter, free
Stay ahead of the changes

Don't miss the next change

Get alerts and full clause analysis when a tracked platform updates this provision. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the weekly letter, free
Stay ahead of the changes

Full clause analysis

Get alerts and full clause analysis for every tracked platform. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.

Monitor up to 20 platforms — $4.99/mo → Get the weekly letter, free
Browse by provision type
Account Control Content Moderation Acceptable Use Restrictions Payment & Fees Refunds & Chargebacks Data Collection Data Usage Data Sharing Data Retention Privacy Rights Arbitration Legal Jurisdiction Liability Limitation Indemnification Platform Discretion Policy Changes Enforcement Actions Monetization Rules Developer / API Restrictions AI / Automated Decision-Making Restricted or Prohibited Content/Industries Disclosure and Transparency Requirements Targeting and Audience Restrictions Commission, Payout, and Attribution Terms Landing Page and Destination Requirements Intellectual Property General Contract Terms Export Controls & Sanctions Other