561
Platforms
166
High severity
344
Medium
51
Low
352
Total monitored
Track acceptable use restrictions changes Get alerts when any platform updates their acceptable use restrictions clause.
Track changes — Compliance
Compare platforms side by side
Select 2 to 4 platforms. Comparison shows clause text, consumer impact, and AI-generated difference analysis.
Comparing OpenAI vs Google-Gemini · Acceptable Use Restrictions provisions
← Back to full comparison

Compare acceptable use restrictions governance provisions between OpenAI and Google-Gemini. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents and classified by severity.

This provision establishes use restrictions that apply irrespective of how users attempt to direct model behavior, creating binding operational boundaries on the service. The hardcoded nature of these prohibitions means they operate as non-negotiable constraints on permitted applications rather than guidelines subject to contextual judgment.
Users are prohibited from directing OpenAI models toward these specified use cases, and the restriction applies regardless of framing or instruction methods employed. The terms establish that these categories of use are not authorized under any circumstances of service use.
No opt-out available
Regardless of operator and user instructions, OpenAI prohibits use of its models or products for: generating CSAM or detailed sexual content involving minors; providing serious uplift to those seeking to create biological, chemical, nuclear, or radiological weapons with potential for mass casualties; creating cyberweapons or malicious code that could cause significant damage if deployed; generating content designed to facilitate actual (not fictional) violence against specific real people or groups; and taking actions that meaningfully undermine the ability of legitimate principals to oversee and correct advanced AI models.
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.
Jul 2, 2026 Unknown
Jul 1, 2026 Unknown
Jul 1, 2026 Unknown
No Acceptable Use Restrictions clause found in our archive for this platform.
AI Difference Analysis Compliance
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.

Don't miss the next acceptable use restrictions change.

561 platforms have this clause. Get same-day alerts and full clause analysis when any of them update it.

Compliance — $249/mo Monitor — $19/mo

561 platforms have acceptable use restrictions clauses.

Get same-day alerts when any of them change — with full clause analysis and audit trails.

Get full analysis — Compliance
Browse by provision type