Cross-platform comparison

Acceptable Use Restrictions, Cross-Platform Comparison

282 platforms tracked · 4245 provisions · 269 platforms high severity · Compare how platforms differ on this clause type.

282
Platforms
269
High severity
252
Medium
97
Low
352
Total monitored
Stay ahead of the changes

Track clause changes

Get alerts when any platform updates this clause.

Compare platforms side by side
Select 2 to 4 platforms. Comparison shows clause text, consumer impact, and AI-generated difference analysis.
Comparing OpenAI vs Anthropic · Acceptable Use Restrictions provisions
← Back to full comparison

Compare acceptable use restrictions governance provisions between OpenAI and Anthropic. Provisions are extracted from monitored governance documents and classified by severity.

No summary available.
No opt-out available
You must not use any Output relating to a person for any purpose that could have a legal or material impact on that person, such as making credit, educational, employment, housing, insurance, legal, medical...
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.

OpenAI's GPT-5.5 System Card was updated in an update detected on September 2, 2026. The updated do…

OpenAI's GPT-5 System Card was updated in an update detected on September 2, 2026. Two sentences we…

OpenAI's Frontier Governance Framework page was revised in an update detected on September 2, 2026.…

The prohibition includes a prior authorization carve-out, meaning the restriction applies absent Anthropic's authorization, and bypass for harmful output is not categorically prohibited where such authorization exists.
Intentionally bypassing Anthropic's product guardrails to produce harmful outputs is prohibited unless Anthropic has given prior authorization.
No opt-out available
Intentionally bypass capabilities, restrictions, or guardrails established within our products for the purposes of instructing the model to produce harmful outputs (e.g., jailbreaking or prompt injection) without prior authorization from Anthropic
AI-extracted from source document. Verify against original for legal use.

Anthropic updated its Claude Sonnet 5 System Card on July 14, 2026, making 251 sentence-level modif…

On July 9, 2026, Anthropic modified its Privacy Policy by removing a sentence that described the co…

Anthropic's privacy policy was updated on July 9, 2026 to add a single introductory sentence descri…

AI Difference Analysis Insight
Stripe's arbitration clause is narrower than Amazon's in one key respect: it includes a small claims court carve-out that Amazon's clause does not. PayPal's clause is the most aggressive of the three, explicitly waiving jury trial rights in addition to class action rights. From a compliance perspective, Amazon presents the lowest risk for B2B contracts while PayPal creates the highest exposure for consumer-facing applications subject to CFPB oversight.
Stay ahead of the changes

Insight only

See what this means with full AI difference analysis.

Stay ahead of the changes

Don't miss the next change

Get same-day alerts and full clause analysis when any tracked platform updates this provision.

Stay ahead of the changes

Full clause analysis

Get same-day alerts and full clause analysis for every tracked platform.

Browse by provision type