Coinbase added a new section to its User Agreement describing Third-Party Liquid Staking Tokens (LSTs) and how they operate when held in a Coinbase account. The updated terms explain that Third-Party LSTs represent entitlements to underlying staked assets plus rewards, that they are minted and controlled by third-party protocols rather than Coinbase, and that holding them entitles users to the economic value and risks of the underlying staked asset. This establishes explicit contractual terms governing how Coinbase treats these tokens differently from its own cbETH product.
The updated terms establish explicit contractual language governing how Coinbase treats third-party liquid staking tokens when held in accounts. The revised agreement states that Third-Party LSTs represent entitlements to underlying staked assets and accrued rewards, that they are minted and controlled by third-party protocols (not Coinbase), and that by holding these tokens users remain entitled to the economic value, risk, and rewards of the underlying staked asset. This clarification distinguishes LSTs from Coinbase's own cbETH product and explicitly limits Coinbase's custodial responsibilities. No specific user action is required.
The updated terms formally establish Coinbase's contractual position that it is not the custodian of underlying assets backing third-party LSTs and does not control the tokens themselves. This clarification reduces ambiguity about Coinbase's liability and custody obligations for LST holdings, aligning contractual language with the technical reality that LSTs are governed by third-party protocols.
Establishes that Third-Party LSTs are minted and controlled by third parties, that Coinbase does not hold or control underlying assets, and that this section applies to all LSTs held in accounts regardless of origin.
This change record describes what was added, removed, or modified in the document. Analysis reflects what the updated agreement states or permits. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Applicability may vary by jurisdiction. Methodology
Coinbase formalized contractual treatment of third-party liquid staking tokens in its User Agreement. The addition clarifies Coinbase's legal posture regarding custody, control, and liability for LSTs held in customer accounts. By explicitly stating that Coinbase does not hold or control underlying assets and does not mint the LSTs, the company may be seeking to limit its regulatory exposure and custodial liability for assets minted and governed by third-party protocols. Compliance teams should verify whether this clarification aligns with existing customer communications and regulatory expectations around staking service offerings.
This change may engage SEC and FINRA frameworks around custody, control, and disclosure of digital asset holdings, particularly if LSTs are classified as securities or security-like instruments in the relevant jurisdiction. FinCEN guidance on virtual assets and beneficial ownership may also be relevant. The clarification does not appear to create new regulatory obligations but may reflect existing custodial law expectations.
Full compliance analysis
Obligation analysis, escalation trigger, board language, and recommended action.
Monitor: regulatory citations + obligations. Compliance: full compliance memo.
ConductAtlas provides verified policy intelligence sourced directly from platform documents. All analysis is intended to support, not replace, legal and compliance review. Record CA-C-002761.
This explicit class action and jury trial waiver is now a separate, emphasized provision, making it more conspicuous and potentially more enforceable than when embedded in the prior version's arbitration clause.
This new provision explicitly discloses the risk that user assets may not be recoverable in insolvency, a material risk disclosure particularly important given Coinbase's custodial role over digital assets.
This new standalone provision elevates KYC/AML requirements and gives Coinbase explicit authorization to demand additional verification documents before service provision.
This new provision explicitly establishes non-refundable fee policy, limiting user remedies for disputes regarding transaction costs.
This new provision governs an expanded service offering (staking), disclaiming reward guarantees, establishing commission rights, and disclosing inaccessibility risks for staked assets.
The prior combined arbitration and class action waiver provision was split into separate provisions with different language structure, though the substantive waiver of class actions remains.
The removal of this explicit title retention and custodial authority disclaimer is significant, as the new version does not reaffirm user ownership or Coinbase's limitations on transfer authority.
The removal of the broad user indemnification clause reduces explicit user liability for regulatory penalties and third-party claims, though broader liability may still exist under other provisions.
Current version expanded scope to explicitly cover breach, termination, enforcement, interpretation and validity, and added carve-out for injunctive/equitable relief for infringement claims.
Current version removed the specific cap on liability amount (value of digital currency on deposit), expanded list of protected parties, added punitive damages explicitly, and broadened categories of excluded damages.
Current version simplified the provision, added explicit liability waiver ('without liability to you'), and broadened language to cover modification or discontinuation of Services in addition to account suspension.
Current version added requirement for 30 days prior notice when changes reduce rights or increase responsibilities, but removed the provision that continued use constitutes acceptance.
Current version added explicit conflict of law waiver, expanded federal jurisdiction to include Northern District of California, and changed language to reference lawsuits 'permitted hereunder' (reflecting arbitration requirement).
Current version shifted from user acknowledgment of Coinbase's compliance obligations to user's own representation and warranty of legal compliance, and explicitly frames requirements as part of KYC verification process.
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle similar provisions across the ConductAtlas archive.
See the full side-by-side comparison of every sentence added, removed, and modified.
🔒 Full diff — MonitorCoinbase removed two sentences from its Fee Schedule on May 21, 2026: 'Need more help?' and 'Start a chat Chat …
Coinbase updated its User Agreement on May 15, 2026 to introduce provisions for 'Secured USDC,' a new feature tied to …
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and…
ConductAtlas detected a major restructuring of Meta’s privacy policy that removed detailed consumer rights disclosures and relocated them t…
ConductAtlas tracked the restructuring, new disclosures, and entity changes that followed the largest privacy fine in EU history.
Get alerted when this policy changes again — including what changed and why it matters.
Prefer a weekly summary instead?
Get the biggest policy changes across 320+ platforms every Sunday.