This analysis describes what Yelp's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The clause channels dispute resolution through a bilateral arbitration process, eliminating the procedural pathway for aggregated claims and establishing individual adjudication as the operational requirement for resolving disputes between users and Yelp.
Users are bound to resolve disputes against Yelp through individual binding arbitration and cannot participate in class or collective proceedings. This structures the mechanism by which claims must be processed and determines whether disputes proceed through arbitration or court systems.
How other platforms handle this
You and OpenAI agree to resolve any disputes arising out of or relating to these Terms or our Services through final and binding individual arbitration, except that either party may bring an individual claim in small claims court. You agree to waive your right to a jury trial and to participate in a...
If you are a U.S. user, you and Tinder agree that each of us may bring claims against the other only on an individual basis and not as a plaintiff or class member in any purported class or representative action or proceeding. Unless both you and Tinder agree otherwise, the arbitrator may not consoli...
Any dispute, claim or controversy arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach, termination, enforcement, interpretation or validity thereof or the use of the Services (collectively, 'Disputes') will be settled by binding arbitration between you and Wise, except that each party retains...
Monitoring
Yelp has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.
"PLEASE NOTE: THESE TERMS INCLUDE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROVISIONS (SEE SECTION 13) THAT, WITH LIMITED EXCEPTIONS, REQUIRE THAT (1) CLAIMS YOU BRING AGAINST YELP BE RESOLVED BY BINDING, INDIVIDUAL ARBITRATION, AND (2) YOU WAIVE YOUR RIGHT TO BRING OR PARTICIPATE IN ANY CLASS, GROUP, OR REPRESENTATIVE ACTION OR PROCEEDING.— Excerpt from Yelp's Yelp Terms of Service
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
Professional Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Professional includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
The clause channels dispute resolution through a bilateral arbitration process, eliminating the procedural pathway for aggregated claims and establishing individual adjudication as the operational requirement for resolving disputes between users and Yelp.
Users are bound to resolve disputes against Yelp through individual binding arbitration and cannot participate in class or collective proceedings. This structures the mechanism by which claims must be processed and determines whether disputes proceed through arbitration or court systems.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 74 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Yelp.