X prohibits the practice of registering usernames with the intent to sell them or prevent others from using them, and maintains a policy governing enforcement of this prohibition.
This analysis describes what X's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The policy operationalizes X's control over username allocation by restricting speculative registration practices and preventing username markets that could interfere with the service's user identification system and resource allocation.
Interpretive note: The operative criteria for what constitutes prohibited squatting are contained in the linked sub-policy, not this index; enforcement thresholds are not specified here.
This provision states that X prohibits registering usernames for the purpose of selling them, meaning users who hold usernames they are not actively using in good faith risk having those usernames reclaimed under the squatting policy.
How other platforms handle this
Don't claim to be human when directly and sincerely asked, use AI to deceive people about its fundamental nature, or impersonate real people or organizations in misleading ways.
You may not use Runway's tools to build or support systems designed for mass surveillance, tracking of individuals without their consent, or the unlawful monitoring of protected groups or activities.
Do not generate images for political campaigns or to try to influence the outcome of an election. Do not generate images to spread misinformation or disinformation.
Monitoring
X has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.
"Username squatting policy - Read X's policy prohibiting username squatting and the sale of usernames.— Excerpt from X's X Rules and Policies
(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Username squatting policies may engage trademark law where squatted usernames correspond to registered trademarks, potentially implicating the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA) in the US. Similar protections exist under national trademark laws in EU member states. X's internal enforcement of this policy operates independently of judicial trademark proceedings. (2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Low for active users; Medium for brand protection teams monitoring trademark-corresponding usernames on X. Organizations with registered trademarks should monitor whether their marks are being squatted and understand X's internal complaints process. (3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: Trademark-based username disputes may have different procedural paths in the EU versus the US. X's internal policy enforcement is distinct from UDRP-style proceedings applicable to domain names, and there is no equivalent standardized arbitration mechanism for social media usernames. (4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Agencies managing brand accounts should include username portfolio management in their social media governance protocols and review X's full squatting policy to understand what constitutes a prohibited squatting registration. (5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Brand protection and intellectual property teams should review the username squatting policy in full to understand the complaint process and the criteria X applies when evaluating squatting claims.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Watcher: 10 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Professional Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Professional includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
The policy operationalizes X's control over username allocation by restricting speculative registration practices and preventing username markets that could interfere with the service's user identification system and resource allocation.
This provision states that X prohibits registering usernames for the purpose of selling them, meaning users who hold usernames they are not actively using in good faith risk having those usernames reclaimed under the squatting policy.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by X.