Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
This provision caps Writer's total liability for any claim arising from the terms or use of the services at the amount the user paid to Writer in the 12 months prior to the claim.
This analysis describes what Writer's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This clause establishes a ceiling on Writer's financial exposure for any single claim or aggregate claims, which may be materially insufficient for enterprise customers whose use cases involve high-value business processes or regulated activities. The phrase 'to the maximum extent permitted by law' acknowledges that applicable law may constrain this cap in certain jurisdictions.
Interpretive note: The clause includes the qualifier 'to the maximum extent permitted by law,' meaning enforceability and the applicable cap amount may vary by jurisdiction and claim type.
Changed from a damages cap based on amounts paid to a broader exclusion of all indirect, consequential, and special damages, with additional enumerated categories of excluded losses.
View full change record →Removed the $100 floor cap, capitalized entire provision, and expanded language to explicitly reference 'inability to use' and future payments ('are payable').
View full change record →Under this provision, the maximum recovery available from Writer for any dispute is limited to fees paid in the prior 12-month period, regardless of the nature or magnitude of the alleged harm. This cap applies to all claims arising from the terms or use of the platform, subject to limitations imposed by applicable law.
How other platforms handle this
If you knowingly misrepresent that any activity or material on our Services is infringing, you may be liable to ActiveCampaign for certain costs and damages.
A party's liability for any Liability under these Terms will be reduced proportionately to the extent the relevant Liability was caused or contributed to by the actions (or inactions) of the other party...
The Netflix service and/or some of the Netflix content may not be available at any time as a result of events beyond our reasonable control...we will not be held liable should such events occur.
Monitoring
Writer has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 20 platforms.
"TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, IN NO EVENT WILL WRITER'S TOTAL LIABILITY ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THESE TERMS OR FROM THE USE OF OR INABILITY TO USE THE SERVICES EXCEED THE AMOUNTS YOU HAVE PAID OR ARE PAYABLE BY YOU TO WRITER IN THE TWELVE (12) MONTH PERIOD IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING THE CLAIM.Excerpt from Writer's Terms of Service
(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Limitation of liability clauses are subject to assessment under applicable commercial law, including the Uniform Commercial Code in the US and national contract law in the EU. In consumer-facing contexts, such clauses may face scrutiny under Directive 93/13/EEC in the EU. The phrase 'to the maximum extent permitted by law' signals awareness that applicable law may limit enforcement of this cap in certain jurisdictions. (2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: High for enterprise customers. A 12-month fee cap creates significant contractual risk for customers using Writer for high-value or regulated use cases such as financial research, clinical trial support, or legal document generation, where errors in AI-generated output could result in losses exceeding annual subscription fees. (3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU member states may impose mandatory liability thresholds that supersede contractual caps in certain circumstances, particularly where gross negligence or intentional misconduct is involved. California and other US states may have statutory provisions limiting the enforceability of liability caps in specific categories of harm. (4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Enterprise procurement teams should negotiate enhanced liability provisions or seek contractual indemnification coverage for high-risk use cases. Vendors reselling or integrating Writer's platform should assess whether the upstream liability cap creates downstream exposure gaps. Insurance coverage assessments should account for the contractual cap. (5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams deploying Writer in regulated industries should document the liability cap as a vendor risk factor and assess whether it is acceptable under their internal risk management frameworks. Where Writer is used in connection with personally identifiable information or regulated data, the liability cap may not adequately cover regulatory fines or remediation costs, which should be addressed in data processing agreements or supplemental contractual arrangements.
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, and regulatory mapping built from archived source documents and historical version tracking.
This clause establishes a ceiling on Writer's financial exposure for any single claim or aggregate claims, which may be materially insufficient for enterprise customers whose use cases involve high-value business processes or regulated activities. The phrase 'to the maximum extent permitted by law' acknowledges that applicable law may constrain this cap in certain jurisdictions.
Under this provision, the maximum recovery available from Writer for any dispute is limited to fees paid in the prior 12-month period, regardless of the nature or magnitude of the alleged harm. This cap applies to all claims arising from the terms or use of the platform, subject to limitations imposed by applicable law.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 287 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Writer.