If Waze is sued or incurs costs because of something you do while using the service, you agree to cover Waze's legal fees and any damages awarded against it.
This analysis describes what Waze's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The indemnification obligation establishes a cost-shifting mechanism whereby users assume legal defense and payment obligations for claims against Waze that stem from user conduct, term violations, or user-generated content. This provision allocates financial and legal risk exposure to the user class rather than retaining it with the service provider.
Interpretive note: Enforceability of broad consumer indemnification clauses varies by jurisdiction; EU, UK, and some US state consumer protection frameworks may limit their practical application against individual consumers.
This provision requires users to pay Waze's legal costs and damages if a third party sues Waze because of something the user did or contributed while using the app, including claims related to content the user uploaded or reported. This applies to all users.
How other platforms handle this
You agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Roblox and its officers, directors, employees, agents, licensors, and service providers from and against any claims, liabilities, damages, judgments, awards, losses, costs, expenses, or fees (including reasonable attorneys' fees) arising out of or re...
You agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless OpenAI and its affiliates, officers, directors, employees, agents, and licensors from and against any claims, damages, losses, liabilities, costs, and expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees) arising out of or relating to your use of the Servi...
To the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, you agree to release, defend (at Airbnb's option), indemnify, and hold Airbnb (including Airbnb Payments, other affiliates, and their respective officers, directors, employees, and agents) harmless from and against any claims, liabilities, damages, ...
Monitoring
Waze has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.
"You agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless Waze and its officers, directors, employees, agents, co-branders or other partners and suppliers from and against any and all claims, damages, obligations, losses, liabilities, costs or debt, and expenses (including but not limited to attorney's fees) arising from: (i) your use of and access to the Service; (ii) your violation of any term of these Terms; (iii) your violation of any third party right, including without limitation any copyright, property, or privacy right; or (iv) any claim that your Content caused damage to a third party.— Excerpt from Waze's Waze Terms of Use
REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Broad consumer-facing indemnification clauses may engage the FTC Act where they operate as one-sided or potentially deceptive terms against ordinary consumers. EU Directive 93/13/EEC on unfair contract terms may render broad indemnification obligations unenforceable against consumers where the terms create a significant imbalance to the consumer's detriment without justification. UK Consumer Rights Act 2015 has similar provisions. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. While indemnification clauses are common in commercial software agreements, their application to individual consumers in a free navigation app context may face enforceability challenges in EU and UK jurisdictions. The breadth of covered scenarios (including attorney's fees and any use-related claim) increases the potential financial exposure for users. JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU and UK consumer protection frameworks may limit enforceability of indemnification clauses against individual consumers, particularly where the obligation is unlimited in scope. California consumer protection law may also constrain enforcement against individual residents. Jurisdictions outside the US may not recognize attorney's fee-shifting provisions as written. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Organizations deploying Waze for commercial purposes should evaluate whether employee use of Waze during business activities could trigger indemnification obligations and whether corporate liability policies adequately cover such scenarios. The indemnification obligation is not capped or otherwise limited in the terms. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams should assess whether the indemnification clause creates material risk for enterprise deployments, particularly where employees contribute map edits or reports that could generate third-party intellectual property or privacy claims. Consumer-facing risk communication materials should acknowledge this obligation.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Watcher: 10 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Professional Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Professional includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
The indemnification obligation establishes a cost-shifting mechanism whereby users assume legal defense and payment obligations for claims against Waze that stem from user conduct, term violations, or user-generated content. This provision allocates financial and legal risk exposure to the user class rather than retaining it with the service provider.
This provision requires users to pay Waze's legal costs and damages if a third party sues Waze because of something the user did or contributed while using the app, including claims related to content the user uploaded or reported. This applies to all users.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 12 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Waze.