This analysis describes what Uber's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
To achieve these processing purposes, we use algorithms to recognize patterns in Service Data, manual review of Service Data (such as when you interact directly with our billing or support teams)...
evaluate Asana AI outputs for accuracy and appropriateness in light of the probabilistic nature of AI and potential for producing inaccurate content.
Your data will not be used by Acorns for training AI models.
"Where permitted by law, we may also use facial recognition technology to compare your selfie to your profile photo to verify that you are the person using your account...Excerpt from Uber's Privacy Notice (Drivers and Delivery People)
How Meta, TikTok, and Supabase restructured governance language across documents, jurisdictions, and consent frameworks through incremental document updates.
How 10 AI platforms describe the use of user data for model training, improvement, and development, based on archived governance provisions.
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The clause states: “Where permitted by law, we may also use facial recognition technology to compare your selfie to your profile photo to verify that you are the person using your account...”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 216 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Uber.