Twilio publicly discloses the third-party entities it engages as sub-processors for personal data processing across its Communications, Segment, and SendGrid product lines, identifying each entity, its processing function, and its country of operation.
This analysis describes what Twilio's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision operationalizes Twilio's GDPR Article 28 obligation to make sub-processor information available to data controllers, enabling customers to fulfill their own compliance obligations including records of processing activities and transfer mechanism verification.
Interpretive note: The actual text of the sub-processor table was not fully rendered in the document provided; this analysis is based on the document type, URL, page title, and structural context rather than verbatim clause text.
This provision establishes that personal data processed through Twilio services may be handled by named third-party sub-processors in countries that may be outside the EU/EEA, subject to the transfer mechanisms documented in Twilio's Data Protection Addendum.
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle Sub-Processor Disclosure Obligation and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →Monitoring
Twilio has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
1. REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: GDPR Article 28(2) requires that a processor not engage a sub-processor without prior specific or general written authorization of the controller, and Article 28(4) requires that the same data protection obligations are imposed on sub-processors. The ICO enforces these requirements for UK GDPR purposes. This disclosure list is the mechanism through which Twilio operationalizes general authorization and transparency requirements. Non-compliance with Article 28 obligations can constitute an independent GDPR infringement separate from any underlying data breach. 2. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. The primary exposure is that any gap between this list and Twilio's actual sub-processor engagements could constitute an Article 28 violation. Customers who rely on this list for their own RoPA and transfer impact assessments bear downstream compliance risk if the list is incomplete or not updated promptly when sub-processors change. 3. JURISDICTION FLAGS: Heightened exposure for EU/EEA-established customers under GDPR, UK-established customers under UK GDPR, and Swiss customers under nFADP. US-based customers using Twilio as a CCPA service provider should confirm that sub-processor disclosures align with their service provider agreements. No specific carve-outs for healthcare or financial services sub-processors are visible in the document, which may require additional diligence for customers in regulated sectors. 4. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Procurement teams should confirm that Twilio's DPA provides specific or general written authorization for the sub-processors named on this list, consistent with GDPR Article 28(2). The DPA should also specify the notice period for sub-processor additions or replacements and whether customers retain a contractual right to object. Customers should assess whether Twilio's flow-down obligations to sub-processors are contractually enforceable. 5. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Compliance teams should establish a monitoring process for updates to this list, update internal RoPA entries when sub-processors change, conduct transfer impact assessments for sub-processors in non-adequate third countries, and verify that Twilio's DPA notice obligations are triggered and documented when changes occur.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 3 platforms + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This provision operationalizes Twilio's GDPR Article 28 obligation to make sub-processor information available to data controllers, enabling customers to fulfill their own compliance obligations including records of processing activities and transfer mechanism verification.
This provision establishes that personal data processed through Twilio services may be handled by named third-party sub-processors in countries that may be outside the EU/EEA, subject to the transfer mechanisms documented in Twilio's Data Protection Addendum.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 1 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Twilio.