The sub-processor list identifies the country of processing for each named sub-processor, which may include countries outside the EU/EEA that are not subject to an EU adequacy decision, requiring reliance on alternative transfer mechanisms such as Standard Contractual Clauses.
This analysis describes what Twilio's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision requires customers to assess whether transfers to sub-processor locations are covered by appropriate GDPR Article 46 safeguards, and whether any location-specific legal frameworks (such as US surveillance law) create residual transfer risk that a transfer impact assessment must address.
Interpretive note: The specific countries of processing for each sub-processor were not rendered in the document extract provided; exposure assessment depends on the actual country list which was not fully visible.
The document establishes that personal data associated with Twilio services may be processed in multiple countries, including countries outside the EU/EEA, which engages GDPR cross-border transfer requirements and may require customers to conduct transfer impact assessments under their own data protection obligations.
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle International Data Transfer Locations and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →Monitoring
Twilio has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
1. REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: GDPR Chapter V (Articles 44-49) governs international transfers of personal data. The EU-US Data Privacy Framework provides an adequacy basis for transfers to certified US entities. Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs) adopted by the European Commission in 2021 are the primary alternative mechanism. The UK has its own International Data Transfer Agreement (IDTA) and Addendum framework. The Court of Justice of the European Union's Schrems II decision requires transfer impact assessments for SCCs-based transfers to certain jurisdictions. The European Data Protection Board has issued guidance on transfer impact assessments that customers must follow. 2. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. Any sub-processor located in a country without an adequacy decision (including, for some frameworks, the United States depending on certification status) requires a documented transfer mechanism and potentially a transfer impact assessment. Customers cannot outsource this assessment obligation to Twilio; they retain independent responsibility under GDPR Article 44. 3. JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU/EEA customers face the highest exposure given GDPR Chapter V requirements. UK customers must apply the UK GDPR and IDTA framework. Swiss customers apply nFADP transfer rules. Customers in sectors such as healthcare or finance may face additional restrictions on cross-border transfers under sector-specific regulation. 4. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Twilio's DPA should specify which transfer mechanisms apply to each sub-processor relationship. Customers should verify that SCCs or equivalent mechanisms are in place for each non-adequate-country sub-processor and that the module of the SCCs used (controller-to-processor, processor-to-processor) matches the actual data flow configuration. 5. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Compliance teams should map each disclosed sub-processor country against the EU adequacy list, identify sub-processors in non-adequate countries, confirm Twilio's stated transfer mechanism for each such sub-processor, and document the findings as part of their transfer impact assessment records. Updates to the sub-processor list should trigger re-evaluation of any affected transfer documentation.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 3 platforms + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This provision requires customers to assess whether transfers to sub-processor locations are covered by appropriate GDPR Article 46 safeguards, and whether any location-specific legal frameworks (such as US surveillance law) create residual transfer risk that a transfer impact assessment must address.
The document establishes that personal data associated with Twilio services may be processed in multiple countries, including countries outside the EU/EEA, which engages GDPR cross-border transfer requirements and may require customers to conduct transfer impact assessments under their own data protection obligations.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Twilio.