Provision record
TaskRabbit · TaskRabbit Privacy Policy · View original document ↗

FTC enforcement jurisdiction over Taskrabbit in US

Common · 264 of 343 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track TaskRabbit and hear on the next check after its terms change. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
ⓘ

This analysis describes what TaskRabbit's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

How other platforms handle this

Kling AI

To the fullest extent permitted by applicable laws and regulations, the validity, interpretation, modification, supplement, termination, execution of this Agreement and any dispute or claim resulting from or in connection with this Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the l...

Patreon

With respect to the personal data received or transferred pursuant to the DPF, Patreon, Inc. is subject to the regulatory enforcement powers of the US Federal Trade Commission.

OpenAI

Except as provided in the dispute resolution section above, all claims arising out of or relating to these Terms will be brought exclusively in the federal or state courts of San Francisco, California.

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
In the US, Taskrabbit is subject to the investigatory and regulatory enforcement of the Federal Trade Commission.

Excerpt from TaskRabbit's Privacy Policy

Provision details

Document information
Document
TaskRabbit Privacy Policy
Entity
TaskRabbit
Date stated by the document
May 26, 2026
As printed in TaskRabbit’s text (version CA-V-006896), not a ConductAtlas date.
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
March 19, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-006896, captured Sept. 12, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-026178
Document ID
CA-D-000144
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Archived bytes SHA-256 (version CA-V-006896)
d32ffc5a6359a7d333fbaf10cb36c03452ddaf6651fb05e9bcfa0e916e71f06c
Analysis generated
May 20, 2026 22:12 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Excerpt found in version CA-V-006896, captured Sept. 12, 2026 (checked Oct. 5, 2026)
Citation Record
Entity: TaskRabbit
Document: TaskRabbit Privacy Policy
Record ID: CA-P-026178
Version: CA-V-006896
Captured: 2026-09-12 00:26:39 UTC
SHA-256: d32ffc5a6359a7d3…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/taskrabbit/taskrabbit-privacy-policy/provision/CA-P-026178/ftc-enforcement-jurisdiction-over-taskrabbit-in-us/
Accessed: Oct. 24, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the weekly coverage letter

Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does TaskRabbit's FTC enforcement jurisdiction over Taskrabbit in US clause do?

The clause states: “In the US, Taskrabbit is subject to the investigatory and regulatory enforcement of the Federal Trade Commission.”

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 264 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with TaskRabbit?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by TaskRabbit.