This analysis describes what Synthesia's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision bars a specific category of data extraction activity that has become a contested area in AI development and intellectual property law, placing contractual restrictions on users who may seek to use platform-generated content as training data for competing or supplementary AI systems.
Interpretive note: The provision does not expressly clarify whether the prohibition extends to user-generated video outputs produced using the platform, or is limited to Synthesia's proprietary content and system data; this ambiguity may affect scope of application.
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle AI Training Data Scraping Prohibition and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →"Scraping any content or data from Synthesia or the Services for the creation or training of AI models or tools, including machine learning models, generative models, deep learning models, and artificial neural networks.Excerpt from Synthesia's Acceptable Use Policy
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
This provision bars a specific category of data extraction activity that has become a contested area in AI development and intellectual property law, placing contractual restrictions on users who may seek to use platform-generated content as training data for competing or supplementary AI systems.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Synthesia.