Strava limits its total financial responsibility to you to either $100 or six months of subscription fees, whichever is higher, and is not liable for indirect or consequential damages regardless of the circumstances.
This analysis describes what Strava's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The clause defines the outer boundaries of Strava's financial exposure across all potential claims and specifies categories of damages that are not recoverable regardless of circumstances. This structure allocates risk by restricting the remedies available to users through the terms of service.
Interpretive note: The enforceability of the $100 liability cap varies by jurisdiction; EU/EEA and UK consumer law may render this cap unenforceable, and US state law outcomes depend on the specific claim type and applicable statute.
The agreement caps Strava's financial liability to you at $100 or six months of fees paid, meaning recovery for significant harms such as data exposure or service failures is contractually limited to a small amount.
How other platforms handle this
In no event will either party's aggregate liability arising out of or related to this Agreement exceed the total fees paid or payable by Customer in the twelve (12) months preceding the claim. In no event will either party be liable for any indirect, incidental, special, consequential, or punitive d...
IN NO EVENT WILL DEEPSEEK OR ITS AFFILIATES BE LIABLE UNDER ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, TORT, NEGLIGENCE, PRODUCTS LIABILITY, OR OTHERWISE, FOR ANY INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES OR LOST PROFITS, EVEN IF DEEPSEEK OR ITS AFFILIATES HAVE ...
TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, IN NO EVENT WILL PERPLEXITY, ITS AFFILIATES, LICENSORS, SERVICE PROVIDERS, EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, OFFICERS, OR DIRECTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY INDIRECT, PUNITIVE, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION DAMAGES FOR LOSS O...
Monitoring
Strava has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.
"TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, STRAVA AND ITS OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, EMPLOYEES, SHAREHOLDERS, AFFILIATES, AGENTS, SUPPLIERS, AND LICENSORS SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO YOUR USE OF, OR INABILITY TO USE, THE SERVICES, EVEN IF STRAVA HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, STRAVA'S TOTAL AGGREGATE LIABILITY FOR ALL CLAIMS ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THESE TERMS OR THE SERVICES SHALL NOT EXCEED THE GREATER OF $100 OR THE AMOUNTS PAID BY YOU TO STRAVA IN THE LAST SIX MONTHS.— Excerpt from Strava's Strava Terms of Service
(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Limitation of liability clauses in consumer contracts engage EU Unfair Contract Terms Directive and equivalent UK consumer rights legislation, which may render such caps unenforceable against consumers in those jurisdictions; GDPR also provides for data subject rights to compensation that cannot be contractually limited. In the US, the enforceability of liability caps in consumer contracts varies by state, with some states limiting their application in cases of gross negligence or willful misconduct. (2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. The $100 cap is standard boilerplate in many platform terms, but its interaction with GDPR data subject compensation rights and state consumer protection statutes creates jurisdiction-specific enforceability questions. (3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU/EEA and UK users may have non-waivable statutory rights to compensation that override contractual caps; California consumers may have additional protections under state law. (4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Organizations relying on Strava data for safety-critical applications such as workplace wellness or emergency services should note that contractual indemnification from Strava is effectively capped and may be insufficient to cover operational liability. (5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams should assess whether the liability cap is enforceable in each jurisdiction where users are located, particularly in the EU/EEA; indemnification provisions in any Strava partnership or API agreement should be reviewed in light of this cap.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Watcher: 10 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Professional Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Professional includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
The clause defines the outer boundaries of Strava's financial exposure across all potential claims and specifies categories of damages that are not recoverable regardless of circumstances. This structure allocates risk by restricting the remedies available to users through the terms of service.
The agreement caps Strava's financial liability to you at $100 or six months of fees paid, meaning recovery for significant harms such as data exposure or service failures is contractually limited to a small amount.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 226 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Strava.