US-based Steam users must resolve most disputes with Valve through private arbitration rather than court, and cannot join class action lawsuits against Valve.
This analysis describes what Steam's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision significantly limits your ability to pursue legal action against Valve collectively with other affected users, which is often the only economically practical route for smaller individual claims.
Interpretive note: The document was truncated and the full arbitration clause text including any opt-out provisions could not be fully reviewed; enforceability varies by jurisdiction and is subject to ongoing legal and regulatory development.
The updated agreement no longer explicitly discloses that Steam Wallet funds held by Japanese users will expire six months after being added, or that expiration dates can be reviewed in the Steam Wallet. The removal of this disclosure eliminates the transparency mechanism previously available to Japanese subscribers regarding fund expiration timelines and monitoring options. Japanese law may still impose expiration requirements on stored funds regardless of contractual disclosure, but the agreement no longer notifies users of this expiration mechanism.
View change record →The provision was significantly expanded to include steam hardware and services, removed geographic restriction (United States or Canada), added prominent legal warning language, and strengthened class action waiver language.
View full change record →US subscribers who experience account issues, unauthorized charges, or content disputes cannot pursue class action litigation against Valve; individual arbitration is required, which may be impractical for low-value claims.
How other platforms handle this
You and Teachable agree to resolve any disputes through final and binding arbitration, except as set forth under Exceptions to Agreement to Arbitrate below. You also agree that disputes will only be resolved on an individual basis and not as a class, consolidated, or representative action.
Any dispute arising from or relating to the subject matter of these Terms shall be finally settled by arbitration in San Francisco County, California, in accordance with the Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures of Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. ("JAMS") then in effect, by ...
THESE TERMS REQUIRE THE USE OF ARBITRATION (SECTION 12.2) ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS TO RESOLVE DISPUTES, RATHER THAN JURY TRIALS OR CLASS ACTIONS, AND ALSO LIMIT THE REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO YOU IN THE EVENT OF A DISPUTE.
Monitoring
Steam has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING CAREFULLY AS IT AFFECTS YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS. ANY DISPUTE, CLAIM OR CONTROVERSY ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING IN ANY WAY TO THE STEAM SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT OR YOUR USE OF STEAM, THE STEAM HARDWARE, THE SOFTWARE OR THE CONTENT AND SERVICES, SHALL BE DETERMINED BY BINDING ARBITRATION... You and Valve agree that each may bring claims against the other only in your or its individual capacity, and not as a plaintiff or class member in any purported class or representative proceeding.— Excerpt from Steam's Steam Subscriber Agreement
REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: The mandatory arbitration clause and class action waiver engage the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) in the US, which generally supports enforcement of such clauses in consumer contracts. However, the FTC has taken increasing regulatory interest in mandatory arbitration in consumer agreements, and the CFPB has at various times proposed or implemented rules limiting arbitration clauses in financial products. The clause is generally unenforceable against EU consumers under the Unfair Contract Terms Directive (93/13/EEC) and against consumers in several other jurisdictions including Australia and Canada. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: High for US-market consumer rights. The class action waiver structurally eliminates a significant avenue for collective consumer redress, which is particularly material given that individual Steam purchases may be small in value but affect a very large user population. This is a common feature of major platform agreements but remains subject to ongoing legislative and regulatory challenge. JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU/EEA users: the clause is likely unenforceable under EU consumer law. California: Discover Bank rule and related jurisprudence have historically imposed limits on class action waivers in certain consumer contexts, though Concepcion and subsequent decisions have expanded FAA preemption. Washington State law governs under the agreement's choice of law clause, and Washington courts have generally enforced arbitration agreements subject to unconscionability analysis. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Organizations procuring Steam services for business use should assess whether the arbitration clause applies to their commercial relationships and whether it conflicts with their standard vendor dispute resolution requirements. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams should verify whether the agreement provides an opt-out mechanism for arbitration (which is not clearly described in the truncated document), and if so, ensure affected users are notified and advised of that right. EU-facing versions of the agreement should be reviewed to confirm the clause is appropriately carved out or modified for European consumers.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This provision significantly limits your ability to pursue legal action against Valve collectively with other affected users, which is often the only economically practical route for smaller individual claims.
US subscribers who experience account issues, unauthorized charges, or content disputes cannot pursue class action litigation against Valve; individual arbitration is required, which may be impractical for low-value claims.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 132 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Steam.