Steam · Steam Subscriber Agreement · View original document ↗

Governing Law and Jurisdiction

Medium severity Medium confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Common · 201 of 343 platforms
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Monitor governance changes for Steam Create a free account to receive the weekly governance digest and monitor one platform for governance changes.
Create free account No credit card required.
Document Record

What it is

Any legal disputes with Steam are governed by Washington State law and must be filed in courts in King County, Washington, regardless of where you live.

This analysis describes what Steam's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

If you need to take legal action against Valve outside of arbitration, you would generally need to do so in King County, Washington, which may be impractical for users in other states or countries.

Interpretive note: Enforceability of the venue clause against EU consumers is limited by EU private international law; practical application varies by jurisdiction and may depend on enforcement context.

Recent Activity

This document changed recently

High Apr 18, 2026

The updated agreement no longer explicitly discloses that Steam Wallet funds held by Japanese users will expire six months after being added, or that expiration dates can be reviewed in the Steam Wallet. The removal of this disclosure eliminates the transparency mechanism previously available to Japanese subscribers regarding fund expiration timelines and monitoring options. Japanese law may still impose expiration requirements on stored funds regardless of contractual disclosure, but the agreement no longer notifies users of this expiration mechanism.

View change record →

Change history

added Jun 3, 2026

This establishes Washington State law and exclusive jurisdiction in King County courts, creating a geographic limitation that may disadvantage international or non-Washington users in disputes.

View full change record →

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

The venue restriction requires non-US users and out-of-state US consumers to litigate in Washington State, which may be a significant practical barrier to pursuing legal claims.

How other platforms handle this

Cloudflare Medium

These Terms shall be governed by the laws of the State of California, excluding its conflicts of law rules, and the federal laws of the United States. Any dispute arising from or relating to the subject matter of these Terms shall be finally settled by arbitration in San Francisco County, California...

MetaMask Medium

These Terms of Service and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with them or their subject matter or formation (including non-contractual disputes or claims) shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to any choice o...

Target Medium

These Terms are governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota, without giving effect to any choice of law or conflict of law provisions. Any disputes not subject to arbitration will be resolved in the state or federal courts located in Hennepin County, Minnesota.

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

Steam has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.

Start Monitor free trial Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
This Agreement is governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington, excluding its conflicts of law rules. You expressly agree that exclusive jurisdiction for any claim or dispute with Valve or relating in any way to your use of Steam resides in the courts located in King County, Washington, and you further agree and expressly consent to the exercise of personal jurisdiction in the courts of the State of Washington in connection with any such dispute.

— Excerpt from Steam's Steam Subscriber Agreement

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (Compliance & governance intelligence)

REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Choice of law and venue clauses are generally enforceable in US consumer contracts subject to state-specific unconscionability analysis and FAA preemption considerations. For EU consumers, choice of law clauses cannot override mandatory consumer protection provisions of the consumer's home country under Rome I Regulation (EC 593/2008) and the Brussels I Recast Regulation, meaning EU users retain home-country consumer law protections regardless of this clause. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. The King County venue requirement is a potential barrier to justice for out-of-state and international users pursuing non-arbitral claims. EU consumer courts have repeatedly declined to enforce venue clauses that displace consumers from their home jurisdiction. JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU/EEA consumers: mandatory consumer law protections in their home jurisdiction apply regardless of this clause under EU private international law. UK consumers retain similar protections post-Brexit under retained EU law principles. US consumers in states with strong consumer protection laws may challenge the Washington venue on unconscionability grounds in some circumstances. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: B2B contracts with Valve should be reviewed separately as the governing law and venue provisions may require negotiation for non-US entities. The Washington State choice of law is operationally straightforward for US institutional parties. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams advising EU or UK clients should note that this clause does not displace mandatory local consumer law protections, and complaints about Valve's conduct may be filed with relevant local consumer protection authorities in addition to or instead of Washington State courts.

Full compliance analysis

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Track 1 platform — free Try Monitor free for 14 days

Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.

Applicable agencies

  • State AG
    State attorneys general in Washington and other states may have jurisdiction over consumer protection complaints against Valve related to venue and governing law clauses.
    File a complaint →

Applicable regulations

FAA
United States Federal

Provision details

Document information
Document
Steam Subscriber Agreement
Entity
Steam
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 10, 2026
Last verified
May 10, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-006079
Document ID
CA-D-00181
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
a48c504d9332997c76ae325e1e850bd8a71b90c3047d8b060770411f740081f4
Analysis generated
May 10, 2026 16:03 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Steam
Document: Steam Subscriber Agreement
Record ID: CA-P-006079
Captured: 2026-05-10 16:03:09 UTC
SHA-256: a48c504d9332997c…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/steam/steam-subscriber-agreement/governing-law-and-jurisdiction/
Accessed: July 4, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Medium
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Start Compliance free trial

Or start with Monitor →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Steam's Governing Law and Jurisdiction clause do?

If you need to take legal action against Valve outside of arbitration, you would generally need to do so in King County, Washington, which may be impractical for users in other states or countries.

How does this clause affect you?

The venue restriction requires non-US users and out-of-state US consumers to litigate in Washington State, which may be a significant practical barrier to pursuing legal claims.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 201 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Steam?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Steam.