Track 1 platform and get the weekly governance digest. No credit card required.
This page describes what the document states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability may vary by jurisdiction. Methodology
This is Stability AI's license agreement governing how their open generative AI models, including image and other media generation models, can be downloaded, self-hosted, and used. The most significant term is the commercial licensing requirement: organizations with annual revenues above a specified threshold must purchase a paid commercial license rather than using the free community license, and all users regardless of tier are prohibited from using the models to generate CSAM, weapons-related content, or content designed to deceive. If you are a developer or business planning to use Stability AI models in a commercial product, review whether your organization's revenue requires a paid enterprise license before deploying.
This document governs the licensing terms for Stability AI's generative AI models, specifically addressing self-hosted deployment options and the conditions under which users and organizations may access, use, and redistribute Stability AI's open model weights. The terms authorize non-commercial use under a community license and require a paid enterprise license for commercial deployment above specified revenue thresholds, with the agreement asserting that any organization generating more than a defined annual revenue must obtain a separate commercial license to use the models. The self-hosted license structure is operationally distinct from typical API-only AI service agreements in that it permits local model deployment while imposing downstream use restrictions, acceptable use policy obligations, and prohibitions on specific harmful outputs including CSAM, weapons-related content, and content designed to deceive. The document engages intellectual property frameworks including copyright and trade secret law, and the commercial licensing threshold structure may require evaluation under competition and consumer protection frameworks in the EU and US; applicability of the EU AI Act to downstream deployers using self-hosted Stability AI models creates a compliance consideration that depends on the deployer's jurisdiction and use case. Material compliance considerations include whether downstream commercial deployers have properly licensed the models, how acceptable use policy violations are monitored and enforced in a self-hosted context, and how AI-generated output liability is allocated between Stability AI and the deploying entity.
Institutional analysis available with Professional
Regulatory exposure by statute, material risk assessment, vendor due diligence action items, and enforcement precedent. Available on Professional.
Start Professional free trialMonitoring
Stability AI has updated this document before.
Watcher includes same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.
Professional Governance Intelligence
Need provision-level monitoring and regulatory mapping?
Professional includes governance timelines, compliance memos, audit-ready analysis, and full provision tracking.
Start Professional free trialCross-platform context
See how other platforms handle Acceptable Use Policy and Prohibited Content and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →Governance Monitoring
Structured alerts for policy changes, governance events, and provision updates across 318+ platforms.