Provision record
Signal · Signal Privacy Policy · View original document ↗

Exclusive Jurisdiction in California Courts

High confidence Common · 263 of 343 platforms

Key Facts · in the document’s own words

Where do users agree to resolve any Claim against Signal?
“You agree to resolve any Claim you have with us...exclusively in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California or a state court in San Mateo County, California.”
Version CA-V-006725, captured Sept. 11, 2026 · live source ↗
Our reading, not the document’s words
Users agree to resolve any Claim against Signal exclusively in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California or a state court in San Mateo County, California.
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Signal and hear on the next check after its terms change. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
ⓘ

This analysis describes what Signal's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

Generated by a model from the captured document; not read by a person

Users are contractually required to litigate claims against Signal only in specific California courts, regardless of where the user is located.

⚠

Interpretive note: The excerpt contains an ellipsis, suggesting possible intervening conditions or language that was not included. Only what is present is stated.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Generated by a model from the captured document; not read by a person

If you have a claim against Signal, you must pursue it exclusively in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California or a state court in San Mateo County, California.

How other platforms handle this

OpenAI

Except as provided in the dispute resolution section above, all claims arising out of or relating to these Terms will be brought exclusively in the federal or state courts of San Francisco, California.

Anyscale

Subject to Section 10.6 , any legal action or proceeding arising under this Agreement will be brought exclusively in the federal or state courts located in San Francisco, California, and the Parties irrevocably consent to the personal jurisdiction and venue therein.

Workday

If any dispute between the parties is not subject to arbitration or cannot be heard in small claims court, then the state and federal courts located in Alameda County, California, will have exclusive jurisdiction.

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
You agree to resolve any Claim you have with us...exclusively in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California or a state court in San Mateo County, California.

Excerpt from Signal's Privacy Policy

Provision details

Document information
Document
Signal Privacy Policy
Entity
Signal
Date stated by the document
May 25, 2018
As printed in Signal’s text (version CA-V-006725), not a ConductAtlas date.
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
April 18, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-006725, captured Sept. 11, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-038108
Document ID
CA-D-000305
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Archived bytes SHA-256 (version CA-V-006725)
22fd0a32d64da9a8ce749b258c40f293478a695d505800e53b904c5ff66b27ff
Analysis generated
April 18, 2026 11:58 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Excerpt found in version CA-V-006725, captured Sept. 11, 2026 (checked Oct. 5, 2026)
Citation Record
Entity: Signal
Document: Signal Privacy Policy
Record ID: CA-P-038108
Version: CA-V-006725
Captured: 2026-09-11 00:50:28 UTC
SHA-256: 22fd0a32d64da9a8…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/signal/signal-privacy-policy/provision/CA-P-038108/exclusive-jurisdiction-in-california-courts/
Accessed: Oct. 24, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the weekly coverage letter

Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Signal's Exclusive Jurisdiction in California Courts clause do?

Users are contractually required to litigate claims against Signal only in specific California courts, regardless of where the user is located.

How does this clause affect you?

If you have a claim against Signal, you must pursue it exclusively in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California or a state court in San Mateo County, California.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 263 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Signal?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Signal.