This analysis describes what Salesforce Einstein's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
We use your personal information to improve and enhance our Services, including through the use of various technologies (e.g., business intelligence tools, machine learning systems, and artificial intelligence), personalize content and features to your interests and goals...
We may enforce this provision using both automated detection methods and human review, in accordance with our policies and applicable law.
Customer shall report the Serious Incident to Mistral AI using the form available on the AI Act Website.
"This prevents the LLM from producing "hallucinations" by forcing the model to cite and use trusted, customer-approved sources.Excerpt from Salesforce Einstein's Salesforce Trusted AI Principles
How Meta, TikTok, and Supabase restructured governance language across documents, jurisdictions, and consent frameworks through incremental document updates.
How 10 AI platforms describe the use of user data for model training, improvement, and development, based on archived governance provisions.
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The clause states: “This prevents the LLM from producing "hallucinations" by forcing the model to cite and use trusted, customer-approved sources.”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 216 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Salesforce Einstein.