Any legal disputes not handled through arbitration will be decided under Delaware law and in Delaware courts, regardless of where you live.
Consumers in California, New York, or other states with strong consumer protection laws may find those protections partially inapplicable when disputes are governed by Delaware law, and the requirement to litigate in Delaware courts creates a practical barrier to pursuing small claims outside of the arbitration process.
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle Governing Law and Jurisdiction and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →Delaware has corporate-friendly laws and courts that may be less favorable to individual consumers than the courts in your home state, and traveling to or litigating in Delaware can be impractical for most retail investors.
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK: Choice of law and forum selection clauses in consumer financial contracts are reviewed under the Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws and under applicable state consumer protection statutes, many of which cannot be waived by contract (e.g., California UCL, CLRA). The Uniform Commercial Code (Article 1-301) permits choice of law provisions but requires that the chosen state bear a reasonable relationship to the transaction. Federal courts have generally enforced forum selection clauses in securities agreements under M/S Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co. (1972), but state courts have been less consistent.
Compliance intelligence locked
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Watcher: regulatory citations. Professional: full compliance memo.