No matter what Pinecone does or how many claims you make, the maximum amount you can recover from them in connection with the website is $50.
This analysis describes what Pinecone's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This clause limits Pinecone's financial liability for any cause of action to $50 total, regardless of the number of claims, the nature of the harm, or the form of the legal action asserted.
Interpretive note: Enforceability of the $50 damages cap may vary by jurisdiction; courts in some states, including California, have examined the substantive unconscionability of nominal damages caps in standard form agreements.
If a user suffers harm arising from their use of the Pinecone website, the agreement caps financial recovery against Pinecone at $50 USD, covering all claims regardless of their nature or number. This cap applies to site use specifically; the Hosted Services Agreement governs Platform and API use and may contain different liability provisions.
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle $50 Damages Cap and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →Monitoring
Pinecone has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.
"TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, NOTWITHSTANDING ANYTHING TO THE CONTRARY CONTAINED HEREIN, OUR LIABILITY TO YOU FOR ANY DAMAGES ARISING FROM OR RELATED TO THESE TERMS (FOR ANY CAUSE WHATSOEVER AND REGARDLESS OF THE FORM OF THE ACTION), WILL AT ALL TIMES BE LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM OF FIFTY US DOLLARS (U.S. $50.00). THE EXISTENCE OF MORE THAN ONE CLAIM WILL NOT ENLARGE THIS LIMIT.— Excerpt from Pinecone's Pinecone Terms of Service
(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Nominal damages caps in standard form agreements are subject to scrutiny under state consumer protection laws and may be challenged as substantively unconscionable, particularly in jurisdictions like California. The FTC Act prohibits unfair or deceptive acts or practices, and a damages cap that effectively eliminates meaningful recovery could engage FTC or state AG attention depending on context and harm type. (2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. A $50 aggregate damages cap is at the low end of what is commonly observed in web services terms of service and may face enforceability challenges in consumer-facing contexts. The cap does not apply to the Platform or Hosted Services, which are governed by a separate agreement, limiting its operational scope to informational site interactions. (3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: California courts have examined nominal damages caps in adhesion contracts for substantive unconscionability. EU and UK consumer protection frameworks generally prohibit clauses that limit liability for personal injury or death and may constrain the enforceability of such caps for users in those jurisdictions. The document includes a carve-out stating the limitation applies only to the maximum extent permitted by law. (4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Vendor and procurement teams evaluating Pinecone should confirm that their primary contractual relationship is under the Hosted Services Agreement, which may carry different liability terms. The $50 cap applies specifically to the website and should not be read as governing API or platform liability without reviewing the Hosted Services Agreement. (5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams should review whether the $50 cap is consistent with the organization's risk tolerance for website-level interactions and whether any indemnification or insurance arrangements address the gap between this cap and potential actual damages.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Watcher: 10 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Professional Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Professional includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This clause limits Pinecone's financial liability for any cause of action to $50 total, regardless of the number of claims, the nature of the harm, or the form of the legal action asserted.
If a user suffers harm arising from their use of the Pinecone website, the agreement caps financial recovery against Pinecone at $50 USD, covering all claims regardless of their nature or number. This cap applies to site use specifically; the Hosted Services Agreement governs Platform and API use and may contain different liability provisions.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Pinecone.