This analysis describes what Perplexity AI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
The Receiving Party will promptly notify the Disclosing Party in writing upon discovery of any unauthorized disclosure or use of the Disclosing Party's Confidential Information, or any other breach of Section 5
Your disclosure of Workday's Confidential Information pursuant to law or a judicial or administrative order will not be deemed to be a breach of this Agreement, if you (A) provide timely written notice...
Company agrees to immediately notify Ramp in writing of any changes that may affect compliance with this Section.
"If Perplexity receives (i) any legally binding request for disclosure of Personal Data by a law enforcement authority ... then (to the extent permitted by law) Perplexity shall notify the Customer.Excerpt from Perplexity AI's Perplexity Data Processing Addendum
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
The clause states: “If Perplexity receives (i) any legally binding request for disclosure of Personal Data by a law enforcement authority ... then (to the extent permitted by law) Perplexity shall notify the Customer.”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 267 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Perplexity AI.