6 Total
2 High severity
4 Medium severity
0 Low severity
Summary

The GPT-5.5 System Card is a technical safety disclosure published by OpenAI describing the capabilities, risk evaluations, and behavioral safeguards applied to the GPT-5.5 model before deployment. The document states that GPT-5.5 was evaluated across categories including cybersecurity, biological and chemical threat uplift, persuasion, and autonomous task completion, with all categories rated at 'medium' risk under OpenAI's internal Preparedness Framework. The document also discloses that GPT-5.5 demonstrates improved performance on agentic and multi-step reasoning tasks and that operator-configurable system prompts and usage policy enforcement serve as the primary mechanisms for limiting harmful outputs.

Technical / Legal Breakdown

This document is the GPT-5.5 System Card published by OpenAI, a technical safety and governance disclosure describing the capabilities, limitations, evaluation results, and risk mitigations associated with the GPT-5.5 large language model. The document states that GPT-5.5 was assessed against OpenAI's Preparedness Framework and that the model received 'medium' risk ratings across evaluated categories including cybersecurity, biological, chemical, nuclear, and radiological threats, persuasion, and model autonomy, with the document asserting that no category reached the 'high' threshold that would block deployment. The document discloses that GPT-5.5 exhibits measurable uplift potential in certain dual-use domains, including cybersecurity and persuasion tasks, and that mitigations including usage policies, system-level safeguards, and operator-level controls are described as the primary mechanisms for managing these risks, though the document does not provide granular technical specifications of those controls. The document engages with emerging AI governance frameworks, most notably the EU AI Act and voluntary commitments made under frontier AI safety frameworks, and the safety evaluation methodology described may be subject to evolving regulatory interpretation, particularly in the EU where the AI Act establishes mandatory conformity obligations for high-risk and general-purpose AI systems. Material compliance considerations include the adequacy of internal red-teaming as a substitute for third-party auditing, the sufficiency of disclosed mitigation measures under future mandatory transparency and safety-testing requirements, and the interaction of dual-use capability disclosures with export control and biosecurity regulatory regimes.

Institutional Analysis

Institutional analysis available with Compliance

Regulatory exposure by statute, material risk assessment, vendor due diligence action items, and enforcement precedent. Available on Compliance.

Get Compliance
High — 2 provisions
Medium — 4 provisions

Monitoring

OpenAI has updated this document before.

Monitor includes same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.

Get Monitor Or create a free account →

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Need provision-level monitoring and regulatory mapping?

Compliance includes governance timelines, compliance memos, audit-ready analysis, and full provision tracking.

Get Compliance

Cross-platform context

See how other platforms handle Biological and Chemical Risk Assessment and similar clauses.

Compare across platforms →

Mapped Governance Frameworks

CFAA
United States Federal
View official text ↗
DMCA
United States Federal
View official text ↗
DSA
European Union
View official text ↗
Trump Executive Order on AI Policy Framework
US
View official text ↗

Related Analysis

Privacy · May 3, 2026
OpenAI Privacy Policy Update May 2026: New Terms Authorize Advertiser Data Sharing

OpenAI expanded its data sharing terms to include third-party marketing partners. The updated policy authorizes the use of personal data fo…

Dependency Governance · June 11, 2026
AI Dependency Governance: How API Terms Govern Every App Built on OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google

872 provisions across 8 AI platforms. The terms your AI provider sets become the terms your product operates under.

Platform Analysis · June 12, 2026
OpenAI Changed Its Privacy Policy 4 Times in One Week. Here Is What Actually Changed.

Ad personalization controls removed. Contact scanning added. Advertiser data partnerships quietly dropped. A timeline of every change.

Regulatory Analysis · June 28, 2026
The Great American AI Act, Explained: What the First Federal AI Law Would Require

The bill does not regulate most AI startups directly. But it changes the companies they depend on. Here is what the first federal AI law wo…

Archival ProvenanceSource & Archival Record
Last Captured July 6, 2026 21:53 UTC
Capture Method Automated scheduled archival capture
Document ID CA-D-000924
Version ID CA-V-004522
SHA-256 d15540cb57b18997073615fb259870e9ebf1e04fce60e3ec8818a82a42be2152
✓ Snapshot stored ✓ Text extracted ✓ Change verified ✓ Hash verified

Governance Monitoring

Monitor governance changes across the platforms you rely on.

Structured alerts for policy changes, governance events, and provision updates across 318+ platforms.

Create free account Compare plans