OpenAI · OpenAI API Data Usage Policies · View original document ↗

Security Certifications and Encryption

Low severity Medium confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Unique · 0 of 343 platforms
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Recent governance activity OpenAI recorded 26 documented changes in the last 30 days.
Start monitoring updates
Monitor governance changes for OpenAI Create a free account to receive the weekly governance digest and monitor one platform for governance changes.
Create free account No credit card required.
Document Record

What it is

The document states that OpenAI maintains SOC 2 Type 2 certification and applies encryption to customer data both at rest and in transit for enterprise and API service tiers.

This analysis describes what OpenAI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This provision discloses the security assurance framework applicable to enterprise data, which is a standard due diligence reference point for vendor security assessments and regulatory compliance programs requiring documented technical safeguards.

Interpretive note: The SOC 2 Type 2 report itself is not publicly reproduced; the scope of systems and controls covered must be verified by obtaining the report directly from OpenAI.

Change history

modified May 24, 2026

Previous version 'Security Commitments and Certifications' had no excerpt; current version specifies SOC 2 Type 2 and encryption details, and severity downgraded from medium to low.

View full change record →

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Enterprise and API customers can reference SOC 2 Type 2 certification and encryption-in-transit and at-rest as disclosed technical security controls when conducting vendor risk assessments or satisfying regulatory documentation requirements.

How other platforms handle this

Ledger Medium

At Ledger, earning and maintaining our users' trust is a top priority. That's why we are deeply committed not only to protecting your privacy and securing your personal data, but also to being fully transparent about how we handle it.

Garmin Medium

If you are located in the European Economic Area, Switzerland, or the United Kingdom, you have the right to access, correct, or erase your personal data; the right to restrict or object to our processing of your personal data; the right to data portability; and, where our processing is based on your...

Strava Medium

We may display advertisements on our Services and those advertisements may be targeted to your interests based on your personal information. We may share your personal information with advertising partners for interest-based advertising purposes. You may opt out of interest-based advertising by visi...

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

OpenAI has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.

Start Monitor free trial Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
We maintain SOC 2 Type 2 compliance and encrypt data at rest and in transit.

— Excerpt from OpenAI's OpenAI API Data Usage Policies

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (Compliance & governance intelligence)

1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: SOC 2 Type 2 certification is referenced by GDPR, HIPAA, and CCPA compliance programs as evidence of implemented security controls, though it is not a direct compliance certification under any of these frameworks. The FTC's Safeguards Rule and state security laws may also reference equivalent controls. 2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Low to Medium. SOC 2 Type 2 is a standard commercial security assurance mechanism. Compliance teams should request the current SOC 2 report to review the scope of controls, audit period, and any exceptions noted. The marketing disclosure does not substitute for review of the actual audit report. 3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: GDPR Article 32 requires appropriate technical and organizational measures; SOC 2 Type 2 can support but does not automatically satisfy this requirement. HIPAA Security Rule assessments should reference the SOC 2 scope to confirm coverage of relevant safeguards. 4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Procurement teams should request the SOC 2 Type 2 report under NDA as part of vendor onboarding, review the scope of systems covered, and assess any noted exceptions. Encryption specifications (algorithm, key management) are not disclosed on this page and should be requested separately. 5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Organizations should document receipt and review of the SOC 2 report in their vendor management records, assess the audit period for currency, and request updated reports on renewal cycles. Penetration testing and vulnerability disclosure practices should also be assessed separately.

Full compliance analysis

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Track 1 platform — free Try Monitor free for 14 days

Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.

Applicable agencies

  • FTC
    The FTC has authority over deceptive representations about security practices and the adequacy of safeguards for consumer and business data.
    File a complaint →

Applicable regulations

EU AI Act
European Union
BIPA
Illinois, USA
CCPA/CPRA
California, USA
Colorado AI Act
US-CO
Connecticut Data Privacy Act Amendments
US-CT
CAN-SPAM
United States Federal
EU AI Act - High Risk Provisions
EU
FTC Act Section 5
United States Federal
GDPR
European Union
Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act
US-IN
Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act
US-KY
UK GDPR
United Kingdom
Universal Opt-Out Mechanism Expansion 2026
US

Provision details

Document information
Document
OpenAI API Data Usage Policies
Entity
OpenAI
Document last updated
May 12, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 20, 2026
Last verified
May 20, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-012355
Document ID
CA-D-00789
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
f5f3edcc42f48d0b6fa827e4876b407a056ca5693555490866c30a33809d5c2a
Analysis generated
May 20, 2026 20:24 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: OpenAI
Document: OpenAI API Data Usage Policies
Record ID: CA-P-012355
Captured: 2026-05-20 20:24:04 UTC
SHA-256: f5f3edcc42f48d0b…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/openai/openai-api-data-usage-policies/security-certifications-and-encryption/
Accessed: June 8, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Low
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Start Compliance free trial

Or start with Monitor →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does OpenAI's Security Certifications and Encryption clause do?

This provision discloses the security assurance framework applicable to enterprise data, which is a standard due diligence reference point for vendor security assessments and regulatory compliance programs requiring documented technical safeguards.

How does this clause affect you?

Enterprise and API customers can reference SOC 2 Type 2 certification and encryption-in-transit and at-rest as disclosed technical security controls when conducting vendor risk assessments or satisfying regulatory documentation requirements.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with OpenAI?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by OpenAI.