Provision record
OpenAI · OpenAI API Data Usage Policies [RETIRED: redirects to /enterprise-privacy/ (CA-D-000825)] · View original document ↗

Security Commitments and Certifications

Medium severity Low confidence Inferred from context Common · 290 of 352 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track OpenAI and get the diff the day its terms change.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Document Record

What it is

The enterprise privacy page references security commitments for ChatGPT Business, ChatGPT Enterprise, and the API Platform, which may include compliance with security standards such as SOC 2 and ISO 27001.

This analysis describes what OpenAI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

Security certifications and commitments in the enterprise context affect whether business customers can rely on OpenAI's infrastructure for processing sensitive organizational or personal data, and whether those commitments satisfy contractual and regulatory security obligations.

Interpretive note: The specific security certifications and commitments referenced in the enterprise privacy page were not available in the provided HTML; this provision is inferred from the document's stated scope.

Recent Activity

This document changed recently

Medium Jul 16, 2026

The updated policy now states that workspace admins 'can control' data retention rather than 'control' it, introducing subtle ambiguity about whether retention control is a guaranteed right or a permitted option. Additionally, the removal of the word 'workspace' before 'data' broadens the scope of data potentially subject to admin control beyond workspace-specific information. These changes could affect how enterprise customers understand the extent of their administrative authority over data retention practices.

View change record →
Medium May 28, 2026

The updated terms establish that workspace admins, rather than individual end users, control how long workspace conversation data is retained and authorize admins to view, access, export, and delete end user conversations. Previously, the policy stated that each user controlled whether their conversations were retained and that only end users could view their own conversations. The revised terms also permit OpenAI to retain deleted or unsaved conversations beyond the standard 30-day deletion window if retention is required by law or reasonably necessary to protect OpenAI's services or third parties from harm. Workspace users should review their organization's data governance policies to understand what access and retention practices their admins have implemented.

View change record →

Clause Stability Stable

0
Changes
3
Months Monitored
May 12, 2026
First Seen
May 20, 2026
Last Seen
This clause type exists across 5149 other provisions on other platforms.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Enterprise customers processing sensitive business or personal data through OpenAI products should confirm the specific security certifications applicable to their tier, as these determine the baseline technical and organizational measures OpenAI maintains for data protection.

How other platforms handle this

Tinder Medium

If you choose to reveal any personal information about yourself to other users, you do so at your own risk. We strongly encourage you to use caution in disclosing any personal information online.

Skillshare Medium

When you are asked to provide information, you may decline to do so; but if you choose not to provide information that is necessary to provide some of our Services, you may not be able to use those Services.

Square Medium

to object to profiling activities based on our own legitimate interests

See all platforms with this clause type →
ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: GDPR Article 32 requires processors and controllers to implement appropriate technical and organizational security measures; security certifications such as SOC 2 Type II may serve as evidence of compliance.

Insight

Unlock the full institutional analysis

Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.

Applicable agencies

  • Federal Trade Commission (ftc)
    Oversees unfair or deceptive business practices and can investigate companies that mislead consumers about data collection, sharing, or use.
    Who can file: Anyone affected by the company's practices (US or international)
    What you need: Your account details, a timeline of relevant events, and a description of the specific issue
    What to expect: Complaints inform FTC enforcement priorities and investigations but do not result in individual resolution or compensation
    File a complaint →

Applicable regulations

EU AI Act
European Union
BIPA
Illinois, USA
CCPA/CPRA
California, USA
Colorado AI Act
US-CO
Connecticut Data Privacy Act Amendments
US-CT
CAN-SPAM
United States Federal
EU AI Act - High Risk Provisions
EU
FTC Act Section 5
United States Federal
GDPR
European Union
Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act
US-IN
Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act
US-KY
UK GDPR
United Kingdom
Universal Opt-Out Mechanism Expansion 2026
US

Provision details

Document information
Document
OpenAI API Data Usage Policies [RETIRED: redirects to /enterprise-privacy/ (CA-D-000825)]
Entity
OpenAI
Document last updated
May 12, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 12, 2026
Last verified
May 12, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-011791
Document ID
CA-D-00789
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
132ecaf0dde05d51f4acb3fac6c1f7c30cd4cc2dfa3900840989e08faf858647
Analysis generated
May 12, 2026 15:05 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: OpenAI
Document: OpenAI API Data Usage Policies [RETIRED: redirects to /enterprise-privacy/ (CA-D-000825)]
Record ID: CA-P-011791
Captured: 2026-05-12 15:05:08 UTC
SHA-256: 132ecaf0dde05d51…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/openai/openai-api-data-usage-policies-retired-redirects-to-enterprise-privacy-ca-d-000825/provision/CA-P-011791/security-commitments-and-certifications/
Accessed: Sept. 8, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Medium
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Related Analysis

Get the research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does OpenAI's Security Commitments and Certifications clause do?

Security certifications and commitments in the enterprise context affect whether business customers can rely on OpenAI's infrastructure for processing sensitive organizational or personal data, and whether those commitments satisfy contractual and regulatory security obligations.

How does this clause affect you?

Enterprise customers processing sensitive business or personal data through OpenAI products should confirm the specific security certifications applicable to their tier, as these determine the baseline technical and organizational measures OpenAI maintains for data protection.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 290 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with OpenAI?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by OpenAI.