OneLogin · OneLogin Terms of Service · View original document ↗

Governing Law and Exclusive Jurisdiction

Low severity Medium confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Unique · 0 of 352 platforms
Get alerted the next time OneLogin changes these terms. Get same-day alerts →
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Monitor governance changes for OneLogin Monitor emails you the same day this changes. The archive stays free.
Get same-day alerts →

Get the weekly research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.

Document Record

What it is

This provision establishes California law as the governing framework for all disputes and requires that any legal proceedings be filed exclusively in federal or state courts in San Francisco, California.

This analysis describes what OneLogin's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This clause requires all dispute resolution to occur in San Francisco, California courts, which establishes a defined legal forum and governing law for contractual claims, and may affect the practical accessibility of legal proceedings for users located outside California.

Interpretive note: Enforceability of the exclusive San Francisco jurisdiction clause may vary for non-U.S. users depending on applicable local law and international jurisdictional rules.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Under this clause, the agreement requires all disputes to be adjudicated in San Francisco, California courts under California law, regardless of where the user or organization is located. No arbitration clause or class action waiver is present in the document.

Cross-platform context

See how other platforms handle Governing Law and Exclusive Jurisdiction and similar clauses.

Compare across platforms →

Monitoring

OneLogin has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.

Get Monitor Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
These Terms of Service shall be governed by the laws of the State of California without regard to the principles of conflicts of law. You hereby expressly agree to submit to the exclusive personal jurisdiction of the federal and state courts located in San Francisco, California, for the purpose of resolving any dispute relating to your access to or use of the Service.

Excerpt from OneLogin's Terms of Service

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Forum selection clauses specifying California courts are generally enforceable in U.S. commercial contracts. However, for EU-based users, mandatory forum selection clauses designating non-EU courts may require evaluation under EU consumer protection law and applicable jurisdictional rules, including the Brussels I Regulation (Recast) for commercial disputes. (2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Low to Medium. The exclusive jurisdiction clause in San Francisco is standard for California-incorporated technology companies. The absence of a mandatory arbitration clause or class action waiver is notable, as it preserves users' access to court proceedings. (3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: Non-U.S. organizations, particularly those in the EU, should assess whether the San Francisco exclusive jurisdiction clause is enforceable against them under applicable local law and whether local courts may have concurrent or exclusive jurisdiction over certain disputes. (4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Enterprise procurement teams contracting from outside California should document the forum selection clause and assess its practical implications for dispute resolution costs and logistics. (5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams for non-California entities should evaluate whether the governing law and forum selection clause is consistent with their organization's standard contractual requirements and whether local law creates mandatory jurisdiction that could override the contractual forum selection.

Full institutional analysis

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Get same-day alerts when this changes → Get Analyst

Monitor: same-day alerts on the platforms you choose. Analyst: full institutional analysis.

Applicable agencies

  • State AG
    State attorneys general may have jurisdiction over forum selection and governing law provisions in consumer and business service contracts under applicable state consumer protection laws.
    File a complaint →

Provision details

Document information
Document
OneLogin Terms of Service
Entity
OneLogin
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
July 12, 2026
Last verified
July 12, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-074361
Document ID
CA-D-00693
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
7fec8f5039b9547d3ee03e85420719b8d7abdb572670a9cc49c418788ea277cf
Analysis generated
July 12, 2026 15:54 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: OneLogin
Document: OneLogin Terms of Service
Record ID: CA-P-074361
Captured: 2026-07-12 15:54:33 UTC
SHA-256: 7fec8f5039b9547d…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/onelogin/onelogin-terms-of-service/provision/CA-P-074361/governing-law-and-exclusive-jurisdiction/
Accessed: July 23, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Low
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Get Compliance

Or start with Monitor →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does OneLogin's Governing Law and Exclusive Jurisdiction clause do?

This clause requires all dispute resolution to occur in San Francisco, California courts, which establishes a defined legal forum and governing law for contractual claims, and may affect the practical accessibility of legal proceedings for users located outside California.

How does this clause affect you?

Under this clause, the agreement requires all disputes to be adjudicated in San Francisco, California courts under California law, regardless of where the user or organization is located. No arbitration clause or class action waiver is present in the document.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with OneLogin?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by OneLogin.