This analysis describes what OneLogin's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
Users are contractually bound to litigate disputes only in San Francisco courts, regardless of where they are located.
If you have a dispute with OneLogin, you are required to resolve it in courts located in San Francisco, California, and may not bring it elsewhere.
How other platforms handle this
the parties consent to exclusive jurisdiction and venue in the state and Federal courts located in San Francisco, California
it shall be adjudicated exclusively by the state and federal courts located in San Francisco County, California.
Any dispute not subject to arbitration and not initiated in small claims court may be brought by either party in a court of competent jurisdiction in either the Superior Courts for the State of California...or in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
"You hereby expressly agree to submit to the exclusive personal jurisdiction of the federal and state courts located in San Francisco, California, for the purpose of resolving any dispute...Excerpt from OneLogin's Terms of Service
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
Users are contractually bound to litigate disputes only in San Francisco courts, regardless of where they are located.
If you have a dispute with OneLogin, you are required to resolve it in courts located in San Francisco, California, and may not bring it elsewhere.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 266 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by OneLogin.