You cannot use Mistral AI to create intimate or sexual images of real people unless all people depicted have explicitly agreed to it.
This analysis describes what Mistral AI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision establishes a content governance boundary for the service by restricting a specific category of generative output. It operationalizes compliance with legal and policy frameworks regarding non-consensual intimate imagery.
Any user who attempts to generate non-consensual intimate images of another person using Mistral AI products violates this policy and may be subject to account termination, as well as potential criminal or civil liability under applicable national laws.
How other platforms handle this
You may not automatedly crawl or query the Services for any purpose or by any means (including, without limitation, screen and database scraping, spiders, robots, crawlers and any other automated activity with the purpose of obtaining information from the Services) unless you have received prior exp...
relate to transactions involving (f) the promotion of hate, violence, racial or other forms of intolerance that is discriminatory or the financial exploitation of a crime... (i) involve offering or receiving payments for the purpose of bribery or corruption.
You must not, and must not allow others to: Facilitate illegal or harmful activity through the End User Services; Cause harm to us or others through the End User Services;
Monitoring
Mistral AI has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"You shall not use the Mistral AI Products to generate intimate images of any person without the explicit consent of all individuals involved.— Excerpt from Mistral AI's Mistral AI Usage Policy
(1) REGULATORY FRAMEWORK: This provision aligns with the EU AI Act Article 5's prohibited practices regarding AI systems that could be used to exploit or deceive individuals, and with criminal law provisions in multiple EU member states and the UK (UK Online Safety Act 2023, Section 188, which criminalizes sharing non-consensual intimate images; similar provisions in France under Loi n° 2018-703). In the US, the DEFIANCE Act (2024) and various state-level laws (California AB 602, Virginia Code § 18.2-386.2) create civil and criminal liability for AI-generated non-consensual intimate imagery. The FTC Act Section 5 is implicated where platforms fail to adequately prevent or address this harm. (2)
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This provision establishes a content governance boundary for the service by restricting a specific category of generative output. It operationalizes compliance with legal and policy frameworks regarding non-consensual intimate imagery.
Any user who attempts to generate non-consensual intimate images of another person using Mistral AI products violates this policy and may be subject to account termination, as well as potential criminal or civil liability under applicable national laws.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 1 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Mistral AI.