You are not allowed to use Mistral AI to give financial, legal, or medical advice — even informally. This applies to all users regardless of whether they actually have professional qualifications.
Users who rely on Mistral AI for financial, legal, or medical research or guidance — including professionals in those fields — may be in violation of this policy, potentially exposing their accounts to suspension or termination.
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle Professional Advice Prohibition and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →This is an unusually broad restriction compared to industry peers — it prohibits not just the AI providing advice autonomously, but users directing it to provide advice, which could affect a wide range of legitimate professional and research use cases.
(1) REGULATORY FRAMEWORK: This provision engages FTC Act Section 5 (unfair or deceptive practices) regarding the adequacy of platform disclaimers for AI-generated advice content; EU AI Act Article 6 and Annex III (high-risk AI systems in healthcare, legal interpretation, and financial services); MiFID II (Directive 2014/65/EU) regarding automated financial advice; and medical device regulations (EU MDR 2017/745, FDA guidance on Software as a Medical Device) where AI outputs could constitute medical guidance. Primary regulators include the FTC (US), ESMA (EU financial advice), EMA/FDA (medical guidance), and national bar associations for legal advice. (2)
Compliance intelligence locked
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Watcher: regulatory citations. Professional: full compliance memo.