MetaMask · MetaMask Terms of Use · View original document ↗

User indemnification of Consensys for breaches

High severity High confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Common · 229 of 352 platforms
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Monitor governance changes for MetaMask Create a free account to receive the weekly governance digest and monitor one platform for governance changes.
Create free account No credit card required.

This analysis describes what MetaMask's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

Users bear the financial and legal burden of defending MetaMask against claims that arise from the user's own contractual breaches or legal violations.

Interpretive note: The excerpt references subsection (a), indicating additional indemnification categories likely exist in the full clause. The canonical claim covers only the explicitly quoted category.

Recent Activity

This document changed recently

Medium Jul 1, 2026

The updated terms explicitly state that UK, EU, and EEA consumers retain statutory consumer protection rights that cannot be limited or excluded by the agreement, and that applicable local law prevails in the event of conflict with these terms. This adds clarity to the legal framework but does not change substantive protections for those users. The terms also clarify that mUSD is a third-party digital asset not issued by Consensys, treating it as a third-party service subject to the agreement's limitations on Consensys' responsibility for third-party services.

View change record →

Clause Stability Stable

0
Changes
3
Months Monitored
Jul 10, 2026
First Seen
Jul 10, 2026
Last Seen
This clause type exists across 994 other provisions on other platforms.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

If MetaMask, its affiliates, or licensors suffer losses from a claim related to your breach of the Agreement or violation of law, you are required to defend them and cover those losses.

How other platforms handle this

Tabnine Medium

Any claim that any user submission made by you has caused damage to a third party

Synthesia Medium

Customer shall have no liability under (a) to the extent a Claim Against Us arises from Synthesia Content or under (b) to the extent a Claim Against Us arises from our breach of the Contract.

Upwork Medium

You agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Upwork, its affiliates, officers, directors, employees, and agents from any claims, damages, liabilities, costs, and expenses...arising from: (i) your use of Upwork Now in violation of this Beta Addendum or applicable law...

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

MetaMask has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.

Get Monitor Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
You will defend, indemnify, and hold harmless us, our affiliates and licensors...from and against any Losses arising out of or relating to any claim concerning: (a) breach of this Agreement or violation of applicable law by you

— Excerpt from MetaMask's MetaMask Terms of Use

Applicable regulations

FTC Act Section 5
United States Federal

Provision details

Document information
Document
MetaMask Terms of Use
Entity
MetaMask
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
July 9, 2026
Last verified
July 9, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-035491
Document ID
CA-D-00279
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
fbc3e940d542d736f423bed59d696fff5bef4265893e8cc2ffd8581c3ba58f1d
Analysis generated
July 9, 2026 07:13 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: MetaMask
Document: MetaMask Terms of Use
Record ID: CA-P-035491
Captured: 2026-07-09 07:13:37 UTC
SHA-256: fbc3e940d542d736…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/metamask/metamask-terms-of-use/provision/CA-P-035491/user-indemnification-of-consensys-for-breaches/
Accessed: July 13, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Get Compliance

Or start with Monitor →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does MetaMask's User indemnification of Consensys for breaches clause do?

Users bear the financial and legal burden of defending MetaMask against claims that arise from the user's own contractual breaches or legal violations.

How does this clause affect you?

If MetaMask, its affiliates, or licensors suffer losses from a claim related to your breach of the Agreement or violation of law, you are required to defend them and cover those losses.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 229 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with MetaMask?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by MetaMask.