Provision record
MetaMask · MetaMask Terms of Use · View original document ↗

Prohibited Jurisdictions and Sanctions Compliance

High severity Common · 281 of 352 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track MetaMask and get the diff the day its terms change.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Document Record

What it is

MetaMask is not available in certain countries, and by using the service you are personally certifying that you are not on any government sanctions list and are not in a restricted jurisdiction.

This analysis describes what MetaMask's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

The clause operationalizes MetaMask's compliance obligations under international sanctions regimes and laws restricting service provision in specific jurisdictions. It allocates to users the responsibility to self-certify compliance with these restrictions at the time of service use.

Recent Activity

This document changed recently

Medium Jul 1, 2026

The updated terms explicitly state that UK, EU, and EEA consumers retain statutory consumer protection rights that cannot be limited or excluded by the agreement, and that applicable local law prevails in the event of conflict with these terms. This adds clarity to the legal framework but does not change substantive protections for those users. The terms also clarify that mUSD is a third-party digital asset not issued by Consensys, treating it as a third-party service subject to the agreement's limitations on Consensys' responsibility for third-party services.

View change record →

Clause Stability Mostly Stable

1
Change
5
Months Monitored
Apr 28, 2026
First Seen
Apr 28, 2026
Last Seen
This clause type exists across 4245 other provisions on other platforms.
This clause has changed once in 5 months of monitoring.

Change history

removed Jul 1, 2026

Removal of specific restricted jurisdictions and sanctions language may indicate broadened service availability or reliance on geographic restrictions provision instead.

View full change record →

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

By using MetaMask, you are legally certifying that you are not subject to government sanctions and are not located in a restricted country — making false representations creates legal liability for the user, not MetaMask.

How other platforms handle this

Leonardo AI Medium

You agree that use of any Beta Services will at all times be subject to your compliance with the Beta Services Terms.

Mailchimp Medium

Send bulk emails, meaning commercial or marketing emails directed to a number of individuals with the same content, through Mailchimp Inbox.

NVIDIA NIM Medium

Customer must comply with any additional terms, restrictions, or limitations (e.g., limitations on the total amount of usage) for a promotional offering as described in the corresponding offer terms.

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
You may not use the Services if you are located in, or a citizen or resident of, any state, country, territory or other jurisdiction in which your use of the Services would be illegal or otherwise violate any applicable laws. You represent and warrant that you are not a citizen or resident of, and will not use the Services in, any Restricted Jurisdiction, or for the benefit of any Restricted Person. You further represent that you are not subject to sanctions or otherwise designated on any list of prohibited or restricted parties.

Excerpt from MetaMask's Terms of Use

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

REGULATORY FRAMEWORK: OFAC regulations (31 CFR Parts 500-598) and the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA, 50 U.S.C.

Insight

Unlock the full institutional analysis

Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.

Applicable agencies

  • Federal Trade Commission (ftc)
    Oversees unfair or deceptive business practices and can investigate companies that mislead consumers about data collection, sharing, or use.
    Who can file: Anyone affected by the company's practices (US or international)
    What you need: Your account details, a timeline of relevant events, and a description of the specific issue
    What to expect: Complaints inform FTC enforcement priorities and investigations but do not result in individual resolution or compensation
    File a complaint →
  • State Attorney General
    State AGs in California, New York, Texas, and other states can investigate violations of state consumer protection and privacy laws, including CCPA (California), SHIELD Act (New York), and equivalents.
    Who can file: Residents of states with comprehensive privacy laws — primarily California, Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, and Utah
    What you need: Evidence of the violation, explanation of how your state rights were affected, and your account or contact information with the company
    What to expect: Outcomes vary by state. May result in investigation, enforcement action, or requirement for the company to change practices. No direct individual compensation in most cases.

    Search "[your state] attorney general consumer complaint" to find your state's direct complaint form

Applicable regulations

CFAA
United States Federal

Provision details

Document information
Document
MetaMask Terms of Use
Entity
MetaMask
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
March 20, 2026
Last verified
April 28, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-003661
Document ID
CA-D-00279
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
ec053f4776b90b65eb51c2683e3e1424a11d07e9193f47929c65fd9551785fde
Analysis generated
March 20, 2026 07:12 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: MetaMask
Document: MetaMask Terms of Use
Record ID: CA-P-003661
Captured: 2026-03-20 07:12:45 UTC
SHA-256: ec053f4776b90b65…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/metamask/metamask-terms-of-use/provision/CA-P-003661/prohibited-jurisdictions-and-sanctions-compliance/
Accessed: Sept. 8, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does MetaMask's Prohibited Jurisdictions and Sanctions Compliance clause do?

The clause operationalizes MetaMask's compliance obligations under international sanctions regimes and laws restricting service provision in specific jurisdictions. It allocates to users the responsibility to self-certify compliance with these restrictions at the time of service use.

How does this clause affect you?

By using MetaMask, you are legally certifying that you are not subject to government sanctions and are not located in a restricted country — making false representations creates legal liability for the user, not MetaMask.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 281 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with MetaMask?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by MetaMask.