MetaMask gives users the ability to replace the default Infura connection with a different network provider, which would prevent Infura from collecting your IP address and wallet address going forward.
This analysis describes what MetaMask's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This is the primary practical privacy control available to MetaMask users; exercising it can materially reduce the amount of identity-linked financial data collected by Consensys, but it requires technical knowledge to implement correctly.
Switching your RPC provider is the most direct action you can take to limit Consensys's collection of your IP address and wallet address; however, doing so requires navigating MetaMask's advanced settings and selecting a trusted alternative provider, which may be challenging for less technical users.
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle User Option to Switch RPC Provider and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →Monitoring
MetaMask has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.
"You can change your RPC provider in MetaMask settings to a non-Infura provider if you do not want this data collected by Infura.— Excerpt from MetaMask's MetaMask Privacy Policy
REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: The availability of an opt-out mechanism is relevant to GDPR's requirement that data subjects have meaningful control over processing, particularly where processing relies on legitimate interests as a legal basis. CCPA/CPRA similarly values the availability of opt-out mechanisms. Whether offering a technical workaround satisfies GDPR's consent or legitimate interest requirements for default data collection is a live regulatory question. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. Offering the RPC switching option is a positive privacy feature, but regulators may scrutinize whether burying this option in technical settings constitutes adequate disclosure or whether a more prominent consent mechanism is required for default collection. JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU/EEA regulators are most likely to assess whether the prominence and accessibility of the RPC switching option is sufficient to constitute meaningful user control under GDPR. UK ICO and national DPAs may apply similar standards. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: For enterprise deployments of MetaMask, the availability of RPC switching may allow organizations to configure MetaMask for all users to use a non-Infura endpoint, which could be a meaningful compliance lever for organizations with strict data minimization requirements. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Compliance teams deploying MetaMask in regulated environments should establish a standard configuration that uses a non-Infura RPC endpoint to minimize data collection by default, rather than relying on individual users to discover and implement the setting change.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Watcher: 10 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Professional Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Professional includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This is the primary practical privacy control available to MetaMask users; exercising it can materially reduce the amount of identity-linked financial data collected by Consensys, but it requires technical knowledge to implement correctly.
Switching your RPC provider is the most direct action you can take to limit Consensys's collection of your IP address and wallet address; however, doing so requires navigating MetaMask's advanced settings and selecting a trusted alternative provider, which may be challenging for less technical users.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by MetaMask.