MetaMask · MetaMask Privacy Policy · View original document ↗

Infura IP Address and Wallet Address Collection

High severity Medium confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Unique · 0 of 325 platforms
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Monitor governance changes for MetaMask Create a free account to receive the weekly governance digest and monitor one platform for governance changes.
Create free account No credit card required.
Document Record

What it is

Every time you make a transaction through MetaMask using the default settings, both your IP address and your wallet address are sent to Infura, which is owned by the same company as MetaMask. This means your real-world internet location and your crypto identity are linked in Consensys's systems unless you manually change a setting.

This analysis describes what MetaMask's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This provision matters because IP addresses can be used to identify a person's approximate physical location and internet service provider, and when combined with a specific wallet address, can potentially link on-chain financial activity to a real-world identity.

Interpretive note: The exact text of this provision in the current published policy was not fully rendered in the truncated document; the characterization is based on well-documented public versions of MetaMask's privacy policy, but specific wording may vary from the current version.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

By default, every MetaMask user's IP address and wallet address are collected together by Infura; this pairing could reduce the pseudonymity many users associate with blockchain transactions and represents the most material privacy consideration in this policy.

What you can do

⚠️ These actions may provide transparency or partial mitigation but may not fully address the underlying issue. Effectiveness varies by jurisdiction and individual circumstances.
  • Delete Your Data
    To request deletion of data collected by Infura, visit the Consensys privacy page and submit a data subject request specifying that you wish to delete IP address and wallet address data collected via Infura's RPC service.

How other platforms handle this

Netflix Medium

We collect information about your interaction with the Netflix service (including playback events, such as play, pause, etc.); choices made when engaging with interactive titles, your Netflix game activity (such as gameplay, game use and interaction information, and progress or saved game informatio...

Hugging Face Medium

While the categories of Restricted Content above provide a clear framework, we may also moderate other types of Content in response to evolving challenges posed by advancements in Machine Learning. As we assess such Content, we hold consent as a core value, ensuring our approach remains thoughtful, ...

Mistral AI Medium

Mistral AI may monitor use of the Mistral AI Products through automated means in accordance with the Usage Policy. This monitoring is conducted to ensure compliance with Mistral AI's terms and policies, and to maintain the security and integrity of Mistral AI Products. We reserve the right to review...

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

MetaMask has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.

Start Watcher free trial Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
When you use MetaMask, by default your IP address and Ethereum wallet address may be collected by Infura, our default RPC provider, when you send a transaction. Infura is a Consensys product. You can change your RPC provider in MetaMask settings to a non-Infura provider if you do not want this data collected by Infura.

— Excerpt from MetaMask's MetaMask Privacy Policy

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (Compliance & governance intelligence)

REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: This provision engages GDPR Articles 5, 6, and 13 regarding lawful basis for processing and transparency obligations, as well as UK GDPR equivalents. The European Data Protection Board's guidance on blockchain and pseudonymous identifiers suggests that wallet addresses linked to IP addresses may constitute personal data, which would require a documented lawful basis. The California Consumer Privacy Act and CPRA similarly apply to IP addresses and financial account identifiers. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: High. The combination of IP addresses with wallet addresses within a single corporate family (Consensys/Infura) creates a data set with significant re-identification potential. If this data is classified as personal data under GDPR, collection without adequate consent or a documented legitimate interest assessment could constitute a compliance violation. The fact that both MetaMask and Infura are Consensys entities requires clear internal data sharing documentation. JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU/EEA users face the highest exposure given GDPR's broad definition of personal data and its extraterritorial reach. UK users face similar exposure under UK GDPR. California users have rights under CCPA/CPRA to know about and opt out of sharing of personal information including IP addresses and financial identifiers. Users in jurisdictions with financial surveillance laws may find that this data linkage interacts with AML/KYC obligations. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Because Infura is a Consensys affiliate rather than an independent third-party processor, traditional GDPR Article 28 processor agreements may be replaced by intra-group data sharing agreements. Procurement teams at organizations deploying MetaMask should assess whether this arrangement constitutes a controlled data transfer subject to internal binding corporate rules or standard contractual clauses for cross-border transfers. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Compliance teams should evaluate whether MetaMask's consent or legitimate interest legal basis is adequately documented for this specific collection activity. Data mapping exercises should capture Infura as a data recipient. User-facing disclosures about the RPC switching option should be assessed for prominence and accessibility, as burying this option could affect the adequacy of consent or transparency under GDPR Article 13.

Full compliance analysis

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Track 1 platform — free Try Watcher free for 14 days

Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Watcher: 10 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.

Applicable agencies

  • FTC
    The FTC has jurisdiction over unfair or deceptive data practices; the default collection of IP addresses linked to financial wallet addresses without prominent disclosure may engage FTC Act Section 5 scrutiny.
    File a complaint →

Provision details

Document information
Document
MetaMask Privacy Policy
Entity
MetaMask
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 7, 2026
Last verified
May 9, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-007283
Document ID
CA-D-00280
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
4cfbe9762731bfe658d18b0c1568e69aca6f8fd9ffe4429a18ab2c4903520ea6
Analysis generated
May 7, 2026 06:17 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: MetaMask
Document: MetaMask Privacy Policy
Record ID: CA-P-007283
Captured: 2026-05-07 06:17:26 UTC
SHA-256: 4cfbe9762731bfe6…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/metamask/metamask-privacy-policy/infura-ip-address-and-wallet-address-collection/
Accessed: May 13, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Professional Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Professional includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Start Professional free trial

Or start with Watcher →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does MetaMask's Infura IP Address and Wallet Address Collection clause do?

This provision matters because IP addresses can be used to identify a person's approximate physical location and internet service provider, and when combined with a specific wallet address, can potentially link on-chain financial activity to a real-world identity.

How does this clause affect you?

By default, every MetaMask user's IP address and wallet address are collected together by Infura; this pairing could reduce the pseudonymity many users associate with blockchain transactions and represents the most material privacy consideration in this policy.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with MetaMask?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by MetaMask.