Provision record
Meta · Llama API Terms of Service · View original document ↗

No sharing of Meta Model API keys

High severity High confidence Explicit document language Common · 265 of 352 platforms

Key Facts

Can users share their Meta Model API key with any third party?
Meta prohibits users from sharing their Meta Model API key with any third party without Meta's prior written permission.
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Meta and get the diff the day its terms change.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF

This analysis describes what Meta's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This restriction places the user in sole control of and responsibility for their API key, and any unauthorized sharing would constitute a breach of the Terms.

Recent Activity

This document changed recently

Medium Aug 7, 2026

The updated terms establish new obligations for developers integrating Meta's AI models into their products. The agreement now requires developers to comply with applicable AI labeling, disclosure, provenance-marking, and system classification requirements under applicable law, with responsibility falling on the developer to implement these disclosures to end users. The expanded definition of Inputs now explicitly includes code, libraries, databases, and any content accessed through connectors or integrations, which may broaden what user-submitted content Meta claims the right to process for safety and security purposes.

View change record →
Medium Jul 9, 2026

The updated terms remove developer restrictions that previously applied to large-scale platforms, meaning companies with more than 700 million monthly active users can now access Meta's AI models without special permission. The terms also eliminate the restriction on EU developers accessing multimodal models and consolidate account management under either managed accounts or Meta accounts. Developers previously subject to these restrictions should review whether the updated terms now permit their use case.

View change record →
Medium May 21, 2026

The updated terms authorize Meta to retain user-submitted content if its systems flag the content for a potential policy violation, in addition to retention tied to legal compliance and contractual rights. This expands the circumstances under which content may be preserved without explicit time limits. Under the revised language, content retention decisions may now be driven by automated policy-violation flagging in addition to legal or contractual necessity. Developers integrating the Llama API should understand that flagged content may be retained indefinitely pending policy review.

View change record →

Clause Stability Stable

0
Changes
3
Months Monitored
Jul 10, 2026
First Seen
Jul 10, 2026
Last Seen
This clause type exists across 1897 other provisions on other platforms.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

The reader must keep their API key confidential and may not grant third-party access to it without first obtaining Meta's written approval.

How other platforms handle this

Mailchimp Medium

Share your password with any person.

Dropbox Medium

Don't share your account credentials or give others access to your account.

Tinder Medium

Use another user's account or share your account with another person;

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
You may not share your Meta Model API key with any third party without our prior written permission.

Excerpt from Meta's Llama API Terms of Service

Applicable regulations

COPPA
United States Federal
CFAA
United States Federal
DMA
European Union

Provision details

Document information
Document
Llama API Terms of Service
Entity
Meta
Document last updated
May 11, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 20, 2026
Last verified
May 20, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-060465
Document ID
CA-D-00778
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
f7072746936cd38d60a586cac1eb5e6d0e1d87c7ca1dddf98d6a80c6bb1e16ca
Analysis generated
May 20, 2026 23:34 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Meta
Document: Llama API Terms of Service
Record ID: CA-P-060465
Captured: 2026-05-20 23:34:12 UTC
SHA-256: f7072746936cd38d…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/meta/llama-api-terms-of-service/provision/CA-P-060465/no-sharing-of-meta-model-api-keys/
Accessed: Aug. 18, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Meta's No sharing of Meta Model API keys clause do?

This restriction places the user in sole control of and responsibility for their API key, and any unauthorized sharing would constitute a breach of the Terms.

How does this clause affect you?

The reader must keep their API key confidential and may not grant third-party access to it without first obtaining Meta's written approval.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 265 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Meta?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Meta.