Provision record
Lyft · Lyft Terms of Service · View original document ↗

Supplemental Agreement Controls in Conflict

Common · 290 of 343 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Lyft and hear on the next check after its terms change. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
ⓘ

This analysis describes what Lyft's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

How other platforms handle this

OpenAI

These Terms contain the entire agreement between you and OpenAI regarding the Services and, other than any Service-specific terms, supersedes any prior or contemporaneous agreements between you and OpenAI.

Kling AI

If any provisions from this Policy are in conflict with any applicable laws, such provisions will be replaced by provisions of the same purport that reflects the original intention of the provision, to the extent permissible under the applicable laws.

Credit Karma

Apple and Apple's subsidiaries are third party beneficiaries of this Agreement, and that, upon your acceptance of the terms and conditions of the Agreement, Apple will have the right... to enforce the Agreement against you as a third party beneficiary thereof.

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
In the event of any conflict between this Agreement and the terms and conditions of any Supplemental Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall control, unless such Supplemental Agreement specifically states otherwise.

Excerpt from Lyft's Terms of Service

Provision details

Document information
Document
Lyft Terms of Service
Entity
Lyft
Date stated by the document
Feb. 9, 2026
As printed in Lyft’s text (version CA-V-004392), not a ConductAtlas date.
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
March 19, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-004392, captured July 2, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-026541
Document ID
CA-D-000137
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Extracted-text SHA-256 (version CA-V-004392)
2ca97b172ea017f9393edf2880c0aabcd20406c18179f9447e1aca5d072ae1e5
Analysis generated
July 9, 2026 05:57 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Excerpt found in version CA-V-004392, captured July 2, 2026 (checked Oct. 5, 2026)
Citation Record
Entity: Lyft
Document: Lyft Terms of Service
Record ID: CA-P-026541
Version: CA-V-004392
Captured: 2026-07-02 00:12:59 UTC
SHA-256: 2ca97b172ea017f9…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/lyft/lyft-terms-of-service/provision/CA-P-026541/supplemental-agreement-controls-in-conflict/
Accessed: Nov. 4, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the weekly coverage letter

Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Lyft's Supplemental Agreement Controls in Conflict clause do?

The clause states: “In the event of any conflict between this Agreement and the terms and conditions of any Supplemental Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall control, unless such Supplemental Agreement specifically states otherwise.”

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 290 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Lyft?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Lyft.