Provision record
Lyft · Lyft Terms of Service · View original document ↗

Pending Settlement Driver Claims Arbitration Carve-Out

Common · 196 of 343 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Lyft and hear on the next check after its terms change. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
ⓘ

This analysis describes what Lyft's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

How other platforms handle this

OpenAI

...and (ii) injunctive or other equitable relief to stop unauthorized use or abuse of the Services or intellectual property infringement or misappropriation.

Anyscale

if we make any amendment to this Arbitration Agreement...in the future, that amendment shall not apply to any claim that was filed in a legal proceeding against Anyscale prior to the effective date of the amendment.

Target

either you or Target may bring or take an individual claim in or to a small claims court...you agree that you or Target may bring suit in a court of competent jurisdiction to enjoin infringement or other misuse of intellectual property rights...

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
If you are a member of a putative class in a lawsuit against Lyft involving Driver Claims and a Motion for Preliminary Approval of a Settlement has been filed ... this Arbitration Agreement shall not apply to your Driver Claims in that particular class action.

Excerpt from Lyft's Terms of Service

Provision details

Document information
Document
Lyft Terms of Service
Entity
Lyft
Date stated by the document
Feb. 9, 2026
As printed in Lyft’s text (version CA-V-004392), not a ConductAtlas date.
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
March 19, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-004392, captured July 2, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-026437
Document ID
CA-D-000137
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Extracted-text SHA-256 (version CA-V-004392)
2ca97b172ea017f9393edf2880c0aabcd20406c18179f9447e1aca5d072ae1e5
Analysis generated
July 9, 2026 05:57 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Excerpt found in version CA-V-004392, captured July 2, 2026 (checked Oct. 5, 2026)
Citation Record
Entity: Lyft
Document: Lyft Terms of Service
Record ID: CA-P-026437
Version: CA-V-004392
Captured: 2026-07-02 00:12:59 UTC
SHA-256: 2ca97b172ea017f9…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/lyft/lyft-terms-of-service/provision/CA-P-026437/pending-settlement-driver-claims-arbitration-carve-out/
Accessed: Oct. 24, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Related Analysis

Get the weekly coverage letter

Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Lyft's Pending Settlement Driver Claims Arbitration Carve-Out clause do?

The clause states: “If you are a member of a putative class in a lawsuit against Lyft involving Driver Claims and a Motion for Preliminary Approval of a Settlement has been filed ... this Arbitration Agreement shall not apply to your Driver Claims in that particular class action.”

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 196 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Lyft?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Lyft.