Get the weekly research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.
This analysis describes what LinkedIn's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
any disputes or claims relating in any way to these Terms of Service or your use of the Twitch Services shall be resolved by a competent civil court in the country where you reside.
it shall be adjudicated exclusively by the state and federal courts located in San Francisco County, California.
For any dispute relating to this Agreement, the parties consent to personal jurisdiction and the exclusive venue of the courts in New York County, New York.
Monitoring
LinkedIn has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 20 platforms.
"if Section 11 is not applicable or enforced as to a particular claim or dispute, an Action will be brought exclusively in the federal or state courts of Santa Clara County, California, USA...Excerpt from LinkedIn's Ads Agreement
Provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, and regulatory mapping built from archived source documents and historical version tracking.
The clause states: “if Section 11 is not applicable or enforced as to a particular claim or dispute, an Action will be brought exclusively in the federal or state courts of Santa Clara County, California, USA...”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 272 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by LinkedIn.