Provision record
LinkedIn · LinkedIn Ads Agreement · View original document ↗

Court Has Exclusive Authority to Enforce Related Cases Batching Procedure

Common · 197 of 343 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track LinkedIn and hear on the next check after its terms change. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
ⓘ

This analysis describes what LinkedIn's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

How other platforms handle this

OpenAI

The arbitrator will have exclusive authority to resolve any Dispute, except the state or federal courts of San Francisco, California have the authority to determine any Dispute about enforceability...

Anyscale

you and Anyscale further agree that the arbitrator shall have the exclusive power to rule on his or her own jurisdiction, including any objections with respect to the existence, scope or validity of the Arbitration Agreement...

Credit Karma

The decision of the arbitrator shall be final and not appealable, and judgment on the arbitration award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof.

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
A court will have the exclusive authority to enforce Section 11.7, including the question whether Section 11.7 applies to a given set of cases and the ability to prevent the filing or prosecution of arbitrations that do not comply with the process outlined in Section 11.7.

Excerpt from LinkedIn's Ads Agreement

Provision details

Document information
Document
LinkedIn Ads Agreement
Entity
LinkedIn
Date stated by the document
Nov. 3, 2025
As printed in LinkedIn’s text (version CA-V-002799), not a ConductAtlas date.
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
May 20, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-002799, captured May 20, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-063452
Document ID
CA-D-000863
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Extracted-text SHA-256 (version CA-V-002799)
b4d968444d2a24af25566f7cbdc5b578e769acfc52e9afb404f99ac1e358aaca
Analysis generated
May 20, 2026 20:53 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Excerpt found in version CA-V-002799, captured May 20, 2026 (checked Oct. 5, 2026)
Citation Record
Entity: LinkedIn
Document: LinkedIn Ads Agreement
Record ID: CA-P-063452
Version: CA-V-002799
Captured: 2026-05-20 12:24:30 UTC
SHA-256: b4d968444d2a24af…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/linkedin/linkedin-ads-agreement/provision/CA-P-063452/court-has-exclusive-authority-to-enforce-related-cases-batching-procedure/
Accessed: Oct. 25, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Related Analysis

Get the weekly coverage letter

Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does LinkedIn's Court Has Exclusive Authority to Enforce Related Cases Batching Procedure clause do?

The clause states: “A court will have the exclusive authority to enforce Section 11.7, including the question whether Section 11.7 applies to a given set of cases and the ability to prevent the filing or prosecution of arbitrations that do not comply with the process outlined in Section 11.7.”

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 197 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with LinkedIn?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by LinkedIn.