Get the weekly research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.
This analysis describes what Khan Academy's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
Waiving the right to litigate in court removes users' access to judicial processes, including jury trials, and constrains where and how disputes with Khan Academy can be resolved.
Interpretive note: The excerpt also references a class action waiver as a distinct legal proposition. That proposition is recorded in omitted_material and addressed separately in clause 28221.
Users who agree to these terms cannot bring disputes against Khan Academy in court; they must instead resolve disputes through binding arbitration.
How other platforms handle this
If, however, this Class Action Waiver is deemed invalid or unenforceable with respect to a particular Dispute...neither you nor Chegg will be entitled to arbitration of such Dispute.
you must first send an individualized Notice of Dispute to Microsoft Corporation...This Notice of Dispute is a prerequisite to initiating any arbitration.
This Arbitration Agreement shall be binding upon, and shall include any claims brought by or against any third parties, including but not limited to your spouses, heirs, third-party beneficiaries and permitted assigns...
Monitoring
Khan Academy has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 20 platforms.
"THESE TERMS INCLUDE A BINDING ARBITRATION PROVISION, INCLUDING A CLASS ACTION WAIVER. BY AGREEING TO BINDING ARBITRATION...YOU WAIVE YOUR RIGHT TO LITIGATE DISPUTES THROUGH A COURT...Excerpt from Khan Academy's Terms of Service
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, and regulatory mapping built from archived source documents and historical version tracking.
Waiving the right to litigate in court removes users' access to judicial processes, including jury trials, and constrains where and how disputes with Khan Academy can be resolved.
Users who agree to these terms cannot bring disputes against Khan Academy in court; they must instead resolve disputes through binding arbitration.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 210 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Khan Academy.