“THESE TERMS INCLUDE A BINDING ARBITRATION PROVISION, INCLUDING A CLASS ACTION WAIVER. BY AGREEING TO BINDING ARBITRATION...YOU WAIVE YOUR RIGHT TO LITIGATE DISPUTES THROUGH A COURT...”
This analysis describes what Khan Academy's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
Waiving the right to litigate in court removes users' access to judicial processes, including jury trials, and constrains where and how disputes with Khan Academy can be resolved.
Interpretive note: The excerpt also references a class action waiver as a distinct legal proposition. That proposition is recorded in omitted_material and addressed separately in clause 28221.
Users who agree to these terms cannot bring disputes against Khan Academy in court; they must instead resolve disputes through binding arbitration.
How other platforms handle this
if a court decides that any of the provisions in the Prohibition of Class and Representative Actions...is invalid or unenforceable because it would prevent the exercise of a non-waivable right to pursue public injunctive relief...
13.4 If any part of terms of this Section 12 is found to be illegal or unenforceable, the remainder will remain in effect, except that if a finding of partial illegality or unenforceability would allow class arbitration, class action, or representative action, this entire dispute resolution section ...
If, after exhaustion of all appeals, any of these prohibitions...are found to be unenforceable with respect to a particular claim or request for relief...then such a claim or request for relief will be decided by a court of competent jurisdiction...
"THESE TERMS INCLUDE A BINDING ARBITRATION PROVISION, INCLUDING A CLASS ACTION WAIVER. BY AGREEING TO BINDING ARBITRATION...YOU WAIVE YOUR RIGHT TO LITIGATE DISPUTES THROUGH A COURT...Excerpt from Khan Academy's Terms of Service
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
Waiving the right to litigate in court removes users' access to judicial processes, including jury trials, and constrains where and how disputes with Khan Academy can be resolved.
Users who agree to these terms cannot bring disputes against Khan Academy in court; they must instead resolve disputes through binding arbitration.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 196 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Khan Academy.