“EACH OF US MAY BRING CLAIMS AGAINST THE OTHER ONLY ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS AND NOT ON A CLASS, COLLECTIVE, COORDINATED, CONSOLIDATED, OR REPRESENTATIVE BASIS...”
This analysis describes what Instacart's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This clause prevents readers from joining or leading class or representative actions against Instacart, which limits the ability to aggregate similar claims with other users.
Interpretive note: The clause name references a jury trial waiver, but the quoted excerpt contains only the class/representative action prohibition. The jury trial waiver proposition cannot be verified from the quoted language and is noted in omitted_material.
Readers are prohibited from bringing or participating in class, collective, coordinated, consolidated, or representative claims against Instacart and are limited to individual claims only.
How other platforms handle this
if a court decides that any of the provisions in the Prohibition of Class and Representative Actions...is invalid or unenforceable because it would prevent the exercise of a non-waivable right to pursue public injunctive relief...
13.4 If any part of terms of this Section 12 is found to be illegal or unenforceable, the remainder will remain in effect, except that if a finding of partial illegality or unenforceability would allow class arbitration, class action, or representative action, this entire dispute resolution section ...
If, after exhaustion of all appeals, any of these prohibitions...are found to be unenforceable with respect to a particular claim or request for relief...then such a claim or request for relief will be decided by a court of competent jurisdiction...
"EACH OF US MAY BRING CLAIMS AGAINST THE OTHER ONLY ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS AND NOT ON A CLASS, COLLECTIVE, COORDINATED, CONSOLIDATED, OR REPRESENTATIVE BASIS...Excerpt from Instacart's Terms of Service
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
This clause prevents readers from joining or leading class or representative actions against Instacart, which limits the ability to aggregate similar claims with other users.
Readers are prohibited from bringing or participating in class, collective, coordinated, consolidated, or representative claims against Instacart and are limited to individual claims only.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 196 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Instacart.