This analysis describes what Instacart's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This clause prevents readers from joining or leading class or representative actions against Instacart, which limits the ability to aggregate similar claims with other users.
Interpretive note: The clause name references a jury trial waiver, but the quoted excerpt contains only the class/representative action prohibition. The jury trial waiver proposition cannot be verified from the quoted language and is noted in omitted_material.
Instacart rewrote its entire Terms of Service, adding 367 new sentences including sections on AI-powered services, updated arbitration procedures, and revised data handling practices. The restructuring makes it harder to compare what changed because the entire document was reorganized.
View change record →Readers are prohibited from bringing or participating in class, collective, coordinated, consolidated, or representative claims against Instacart and are limited to individual claims only.
How other platforms handle this
If, however, this Class Action Waiver is deemed invalid or unenforceable with respect to a particular Dispute...neither you nor Chegg will be entitled to arbitration of such Dispute.
Neither you nor we may elect arbitration of any claims seeking only individualized relief asserted by you or us in small claims court, so long as the action remains in that court and is not removed or appealed de novo...
Monitoring
Instacart has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"EACH OF US MAY BRING CLAIMS AGAINST THE OTHER ONLY ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS AND NOT ON A CLASS, COLLECTIVE, COORDINATED, CONSOLIDATED, OR REPRESENTATIVE BASIS...— Excerpt from Instacart's Instacart Terms of Service
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This clause prevents readers from joining or leading class or representative actions against Instacart, which limits the ability to aggregate similar claims with other users.
Readers are prohibited from bringing or participating in class, collective, coordinated, consolidated, or representative claims against Instacart and are limited to individual claims only.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 205 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Instacart.