This analysis describes what Grammarly's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
You may not use our Services in any manner that infringes the rights of any third party.
Assist or permit any persons in engaging in any of the activities described above
use the Services in a manner that may create a conflict of interest or undermine the purposes of the Services, such as trading reviews with other users or writing or soliciting fake reviews
"You also must not use our generative AI features i) in a way that infringes, violates, or misappropriates any of our rights or the rights of any third party...Excerpt from Grammarly's Terms of Service
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
The clause states: “You also must not use our generative AI features i) in a way that infringes, violates, or misappropriates any of our rights or the rights of any third party...”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 272 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Grammarly.