This provision requires that claims be brought individually and prohibits class, representative, or collective actions against Superhuman, with an exception permitting batch arbitration procedures under Section 12.6.
This analysis describes what Grammarly's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
Users cannot pool claims with others against Superhuman, which limits the practical ability to pursue low-value individual claims and eliminates class-action leverage.
Interpretive note: The clause name references a jury trial waiver, but no such language appears in the provided excerpt. The canonical claim and all derived fields are limited to the class/collective action waiver language present in the excerpt.
Under this clause, consumers are required to pursue any claims against Superhuman individually rather than as part of a class or collective action, which may affect the practical cost-benefit of pursuing low-value claims. The batch arbitration mechanism in Section 12.6 provides a limited alternative for similar claims.
How other platforms handle this
If, however, this Class Action Waiver is deemed invalid or unenforceable with respect to a particular Dispute...neither you nor Chegg will be entitled to arbitration of such Dispute.
the arbitration provider, National Arbitration and Mediation ("NAM"), shall not accept or administer any demand for arbitration and shall administratively close any arbitration unless the Party bringing such demand for arbitration can certify in writing that the terms...were fully satisfied.
Neither you nor we may elect arbitration of any claims seeking only individualized relief asserted by you or us in small claims court, so long as the action remains in that court and is not removed or appealed de novo...
"You and Superhuman agree that each of us may bring claims against the other only on an individual basis, and not on a class, representative, or collective basis (and we each waive any right we have to bring such claims).Excerpt from Grammarly's Terms of Service
1.
Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
Users cannot pool claims with others against Superhuman, which limits the practical ability to pursue low-value individual claims and eliminates class-action leverage.
Under this clause, consumers are required to pursue any claims against Superhuman individually rather than as part of a class or collective action, which may affect the practical cost-benefit of pursuing low-value claims. The batch arbitration mechanism in Section 12.6 provides a limited alternative for similar claims.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 206 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Grammarly.