“You and Superhuman agree that each of us may bring claims against the other only on an individual basis, and not on a class, representative, or collective basis (and we each waive any right we have to bring such claims).”
This provision requires that claims be brought individually and prohibits class, representative, or collective actions against Superhuman, with an exception permitting batch arbitration procedures under Section 12.6.
This analysis describes what Grammarly's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
Users cannot pool claims with others against Superhuman, which limits the practical ability to pursue low-value individual claims and eliminates class-action leverage.
Interpretive note: The clause name references a jury trial waiver, but no such language appears in the provided excerpt. The canonical claim and all derived fields are limited to the class/collective action waiver language present in the excerpt.
Under this clause, consumers are required to pursue any claims against Superhuman individually rather than as part of a class or collective action, which may affect the practical cost-benefit of pursuing low-value claims. The batch arbitration mechanism in Section 12.6 provides a limited alternative for similar claims.
How other platforms handle this
if a court decides that any of the provisions in the Prohibition of Class and Representative Actions...is invalid or unenforceable because it would prevent the exercise of a non-waivable right to pursue public injunctive relief...
13.4 If any part of terms of this Section 12 is found to be illegal or unenforceable, the remainder will remain in effect, except that if a finding of partial illegality or unenforceability would allow class arbitration, class action, or representative action, this entire dispute resolution section ...
If, after exhaustion of all appeals, any of these prohibitions...are found to be unenforceable with respect to a particular claim or request for relief...then such a claim or request for relief will be decided by a court of competent jurisdiction...
"You and Superhuman agree that each of us may bring claims against the other only on an individual basis, and not on a class, representative, or collective basis (and we each waive any right we have to bring such claims).Excerpt from Grammarly's Terms of Service
1.
Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
Users cannot pool claims with others against Superhuman, which limits the practical ability to pursue low-value individual claims and eliminates class-action leverage.
Under this clause, consumers are required to pursue any claims against Superhuman individually rather than as part of a class or collective action, which may affect the practical cost-benefit of pursuing low-value claims. The batch arbitration mechanism in Section 12.6 provides a limited alternative for similar claims.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 197 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Grammarly.