This analysis describes what Grammarly's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
Mandatory individual arbitration removes users' access to court proceedings and a jury for disputes arising from their use of the Services.
Users cannot bring claims relating to their access to or use of the Services in court; those claims must go to individual arbitration.
How other platforms handle this
This Arbitration Agreement shall be binding upon, and shall include any claims brought by or against any third parties, including but not limited to your spouses, heirs, third-party beneficiaries and permitted assigns...
the arbitration provider, National Arbitration and Mediation ("NAM"), shall not accept or administer any demand for arbitration and shall administratively close any arbitration unless the Party bringing such demand for arbitration can certify in writing that the terms...were fully satisfied.
Neither you nor we may elect arbitration of any claims seeking only individualized relief asserted by you or us in small claims court, so long as the action remains in that court and is not removed or appealed de novo...
"You and Superhuman agree to mandatory individual arbitration for all claims arising out of or relating in any way to your access to or use of the Services...Excerpt from Grammarly's Terms of Service
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
Mandatory individual arbitration removes users' access to court proceedings and a jury for disputes arising from their use of the Services.
Users cannot bring claims relating to their access to or use of the Services in court; those claims must go to individual arbitration.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 206 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Grammarly.