Google · Google AI Principles · View original document ↗

Prohibited AI Application Categories

Medium severity Medium confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Unique · 0 of 343 platforms
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Recent governance activity Google recorded 5 documented changes in the last 30 days.
Start monitoring updates
Monitor governance changes for Google Create a free account to receive the weekly governance digest and monitor one platform for governance changes.
Create free account No credit card required.
Document Record

What it is

Google states it will not build AI for weapons, surveillance that violates international norms, or other applications whose primary purpose is to harm people.

This analysis describes what Google's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This provision establishes the outer limits of what Google states it will develop using AI, which is relevant for organizations, governments, and individuals assessing whether Google AI infrastructure can be used for sensitive or defense-related applications.

Interpretive note: The prohibited categories use broad qualitative language such as 'internationally accepted norms' and 'widely accepted principles,' which may require case-by-case interpretation and may vary across jurisdictions.

Clause Stability Stable

0
Changes
3
Months Monitored
May 12, 2026
First Seen
May 22, 2026
Last Seen
This clause type exists across 362 other provisions on other platforms.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

The document states that Google will not develop AI technologies whose principal purpose is to cause injury or enable surveillance that violates internationally accepted norms, which represents a stated limit on how Google's AI capabilities may be applied in products and services consumers interact with.

How other platforms handle this

Twitch Medium

You agree that you will not: post, upload, transmit, or otherwise make available through the Twitch Services any content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic, abusive, harassing, threatening, hateful, objectionable with respect to race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, national o...

Amazon Medium

You may not use, or facilitate or allow others to use, the Services or AWS Site: in a way that violates any applicable law or regulation; to engage in, promote, facilitate or encourage illegal activity; to threaten, incite, promote, or actively encourage violence, terrorism, other serious harm; or i...

OpenAI Medium

You agree to comply with our Usage Policies, which are incorporated into these Terms. You may not use our Services to develop or train competing AI models, to generate content that violates our policies, or for any illegal purpose. Violation of our Usage Policies may result in suspension or terminat...

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

Google has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.

Start Monitor free trial Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
We will not design or deploy AI in the following application areas: Technologies that cause or are likely to cause overall harm. Where there is uncertainty, we will err on the side of caution, and we will work to understand those tradeoffs. Weapons or other technologies whose principal purpose or implementation is to cause or directly facilitate injury to people. Technologies that gather or use information for surveillance violating internationally accepted norms. Technologies whose purpose contravenes widely accepted principles of international law and human rights.

— Excerpt from Google's Google AI Principles

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (Compliance & governance intelligence)

REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: This provision engages with international humanitarian law, human rights frameworks, and emerging mandatory AI governance instruments including the EU AI Act, which designates certain AI applications as prohibited or high-risk. The FTC has signaled interest in AI practices that create consumer harm. No specific enforcement authority is named in the document itself, and the provision does not reference specific treaty obligations by name. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. The prohibition is stated as a voluntary commitment. The categories listed, including surveillance tools violating international norms and weapons applications, are broadly defined and their application in specific commercial or government contexts would require further interpretation. Organizations in defense, security, or law enforcement sectors using Google AI should assess whether their use cases align with these stated restrictions. JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU jurisdiction creates heightened exposure given the EU AI Act's explicit prohibitions on certain AI applications including mass biometric surveillance. Organizations operating in the EU, UK, or under ITAR/EAR export control regimes should evaluate alignment between these stated principles and applicable mandatory requirements. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Organizations procuring Google AI services for sensitive applications should assess whether these stated principles are incorporated by reference into Google's commercial API or cloud agreements, which could create contractual enforcement mechanisms beyond the voluntary framework. This provision may also affect due diligence assessments for B2B customers in regulated sectors. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Compliance teams should monitor whether Google's evolving interpretation of these categories is reflected in product-level documentation, API terms, or usage policies. Organizations building AI applications on Google infrastructure should assess whether their use cases are consistent with these stated restrictions to avoid potential service termination or reputational exposure.

Full compliance analysis

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Track 1 platform — free Try Monitor free for 14 days

Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.

Applicable agencies

  • FTC
    The FTC has authority over unfair or deceptive practices and has issued guidance on AI, making voluntary AI commitments relevant to consumer protection oversight.
    File a complaint →

Applicable regulations

DMCA
United States Federal
DSA
European Union

Provision details

Document information
Document
Google AI Principles
Entity
Google
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
April 27, 2026
Last verified
May 12, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-011589
Document ID
CA-D-00016
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
01eac047cd91414b4bffbdeac9454c7595d79a555798103c33fd9d1b80ee2c7f
Analysis generated
April 27, 2026 09:45 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Google
Document: Google AI Principles
Record ID: CA-P-011589
Captured: 2026-04-27 09:45:22 UTC
SHA-256: 01eac047cd91414b…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/google/google-ai-principles/prohibited-ai-application-categories/
Accessed: July 4, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Medium
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Start Compliance free trial

Or start with Monitor →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Google's Prohibited AI Application Categories clause do?

This provision establishes the outer limits of what Google states it will develop using AI, which is relevant for organizations, governments, and individuals assessing whether Google AI infrastructure can be used for sensitive or defense-related applications.

How does this clause affect you?

The document states that Google will not develop AI technologies whose principal purpose is to cause injury or enable surveillance that violates internationally accepted norms, which represents a stated limit on how Google's AI capabilities may be applied in products and services consumers interact with.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Google?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Google.