7 Total
4 High severity
2 Medium severity
1 Low severity
Summary

This document establishes the prohibited use policies for Google's generative AI services, including the Gemini app and Gemini API. The policy prohibits users from generating content that facilitates harm, including violent, deceptive, or sexually exploitative material, and specifies restricted uses in high-stakes domains such as medical diagnosis, legal advice, and safety-critical decisions without qualified human oversight. Google reserves the right to suspend or terminate access to the service for violations of these prohibited use categories.

Technical / Legal Breakdown

This document is Google's Generative AI Additional Terms of Service and Use Policy, governing use of Google's generative AI products including Gemini apps and the Gemini API, and operating as a supplement to the Google Terms of Service. The agreement states that users must not use the services to generate content that facilitates violence, generates misinformation, creates CSAM, enables cyberattacks, or violates applicable law, and that Google reserves the right to suspend or terminate access for policy violations. The use policy enumerates specific prohibited categories of content and use cases, including content designed to deceive, content that sexualizes minors, and automated pipelines without human oversight in high-stakes domains such as healthcare and legal advice, which distinguishes this document operationally from general-purpose ToS frameworks by incorporating AI-specific safety constraints on outputs. The document engages the EU AI Act, GDPR, the FTC Act, and COPPA given the scope of AI-generated content, automated decision-making disclosures, and restrictions on use involving minors; applicability of specific regulatory obligations depends on user jurisdiction and deployment context. Compliance teams deploying Gemini API in commercial or regulated contexts should evaluate whether use-case-specific restrictions in this policy create contractual risk, particularly in healthcare, legal, financial, and educational applications where the policy explicitly limits reliance on AI outputs.

Institutional Analysis

Institutional analysis available with Compliance

Regulatory exposure by statute, material risk assessment, vendor due diligence action items, and enforcement precedent. Available on Compliance.

Start Compliance free trial
High — 4 provisions
Medium — 2 provisions
Low — 1 provision

Monitoring

Google Gemini has updated this document before.

Monitor includes same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.

Start Monitor free trial Or create a free account →

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Need provision-level monitoring and regulatory mapping?

Compliance includes governance timelines, compliance memos, audit-ready analysis, and full provision tracking.

Start Compliance free trial

Cross-platform context

See how other platforms handle AI Output Accuracy Disclaimer and similar clauses.

Compare across platforms →

Mapped Governance Frameworks

California AB 2013 AI Training Data Transparency
US-CA
View official text ↗
DSA
European Union
View official text ↗
EFTA / Reg E
United States Federal
View official text ↗
Archival ProvenanceSource & Archival Record
Last Captured June 12, 2026 00:41 UTC
Capture Method Automated scheduled archival capture
Document ID CA-D-000325
Version ID CA-V-003722
SHA-256 a6e02c135fadba0495e79a28723daeb7ea78fcd0596f348dbda4aaea4ae9503a
✓ Snapshot stored ✓ Text extracted ✓ Change verified ✓ Hash verified

Governance Monitoring

Monitor governance changes across the platforms you rely on.

Structured alerts for policy changes, governance events, and provision updates across 318+ platforms.

Create free account Compare plans