Provision record
General Motors · GM Terms of Use · View original document ↗

Counter-Notice Consent to Federal Court Jurisdiction in Detroit

Common · 264 of 343 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track General Motors and hear on the next check after its terms change. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
ⓘ

This analysis describes what General Motors's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

How other platforms handle this

OpenAI

Except as provided in the dispute resolution section above, all claims arising out of or relating to these Terms will be brought exclusively in the federal or state courts of San Francisco, California.

Anyscale

Subject to Section 10.6 , any legal action or proceeding arising under this Agreement will be brought exclusively in the federal or state courts located in San Francisco, California, and the Parties irrevocably consent to the personal jurisdiction and venue therein.

Kling AI

To the fullest extent permitted by applicable laws and regulations, the validity, interpretation, modification, supplement, termination, execution of this Agreement and any dispute or claim resulting from or in connection with this Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the l...

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
A statement that you consent to the jurisdiction of the federal court in Detroit and a statement that you will accept service of process from the person who provided notification of the alleged infringement.

Excerpt from General Motors's GM Terms of Use

Provision details

Document information
Document
GM Terms of Use
Entity
General Motors
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
July 11, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-004778, captured July 11, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-072334
Document ID
CA-D-000614
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Extracted-text SHA-256 (version CA-V-004778)
393210a2e4ea553723e51b9b0908bc63af69cea9f8137a6856c7c6d571dce770
Analysis generated
July 12, 2026 15:39 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Excerpt found in version CA-V-004778, captured July 11, 2026 (checked Oct. 5, 2026)
Citation Record
Entity: General Motors
Document: GM Terms of Use
Record ID: CA-P-072334
Version: CA-V-004778
Captured: 2026-07-11 13:48:50 UTC
SHA-256: 393210a2e4ea5537…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/general-motors/gm-terms-of-use/provision/CA-P-072334/counter-notice-consent-to-federal-court-jurisdiction-in-detroit/
Accessed: Oct. 23, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the weekly coverage letter

Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does General Motors's Counter-Notice Consent to Federal Court Jurisdiction in Detroit clause do?

The clause states: “A statement that you consent to the jurisdiction of the federal court in Detroit and a statement that you will accept service of process from the person who provided notification of the alleged infringement.”

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 264 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with General Motors?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by General Motors.