This analysis describes what General Motors's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
General Motors has set a baseline procedural requirement — a warrant or court order — for most government disclosures of personal information, which limits routine or informal government access.
The updated statement narrowed its definition of personal information from 'identifies, relates to, or could reasonably be linked to you' to 'describes, relates to, or could reasonably be linked to you.' This language change affects which information GM must treat as personal information under the policy. The revised de-identification section reorganizes prior language, now stating GM 'may use technical measures to remove information that could reasonably identify you or your vehicle' and requires 'the same safeguards from any third parties we share it with.' The policy clarifies that its protections apply to personal information dealers disclose to GM, but do not cover dealers' independent data practices. Cruise is no longer listed as a GM affiliate exempt from this privacy statement, though the scope of privacy protections for Cruise users depends on whether Cruise now operates under this statement or maintains separate privacy terms.
View change record →Your personal information will generally not be disclosed to the government without a warrant or court order, though exceptions exist for exigent circumstances and applicable statutory authority.
How other platforms handle this
disclosure is required by a third-party to complete a transaction initiated by the user
If we're involved in a reorganization, merger, acquisition, sale of some or all of our assets or other business transaction, depending on the circumstances, we may disclose any of the information described in Section 2 above...
Third-party apps use data from Gemini consistent with their own privacy policies and terms.
Monitoring
General Motors has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"As reasonably necessary to comply with a lawful government request, regulatory requirement, legal order, or similar obligation, which must be in the form of a warrant or court order, absent exigent circumstances or applicable statutory authority— Excerpt from General Motors's GM Privacy Statement
ConductAtlas detected a major restructuring of Meta’s privacy policy that removed detailed consumer rights disclosures and relocated them to separate documents.
Your genetic data may be transferred to a new owner as a business asset. Here is what the Terms of Service actually say and what you can do right now.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
General Motors has set a baseline procedural requirement — a warrant or court order — for most government disclosures of personal information, which limits routine or informal government access.
Your personal information will generally not be disclosed to the government without a warrant or court order, though exceptions exist for exigent circumstances and applicable statutory authority.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 289 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by General Motors.