Provision record
Figma · Figma Terms of Service · View original document ↗

Acceptable Use Restrictions

Low severity Unique · 0 of 352 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Figma and get the diff the day its terms change.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Document Record

What it is

Figma prohibits using their platform for illegal activities, harassment, distributing malware, scraping their services, or any activity that violates their policies.

This analysis describes what Figma's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

Violating these restrictions can result in immediate account suspension or termination, so users should be familiar with what activities are prohibited.

Recent Activity

This document changed recently

Medium Mar 31, 2026

The removal of the Subprocessors list link makes it less convenient for users, particularly enterprise and EU-based customers who rely on this information for data protection compliance, to verify which third parties Figma engages to process their data. While the subprocessor information may still exist on Figma's website, removing the direct link from the Terms of Service reduces accessibility and transparency. Enterprise customers and those subject to GDPR may need to contact Figma directly to access current subprocessor information.

View change record →

Cross-platform context

See how other platforms handle Acceptable Use Restrictions and similar clauses.

Compare across platforms →
ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

Acceptable use policies create compliance obligations for enterprise customers deploying Figma at scale; IT and legal teams should ensure organizational usage policies align with Figma's restrictions, particularly regarding automation, API usage, and data scraping.

Insight

Unlock the full institutional analysis

Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.

Provision details

Document information
Document
Figma Terms of Service
Entity
Figma
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
March 20, 2026
Last verified
March 20, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-00205008
Document ID
CA-D-00205
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
60393e7848e5b9c36842c61172e2396d9a0afc59d1a79061efdbc012c17a0331
Analysis generated
March 20, 2026 11:21 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Figma
Document: Figma Terms of Service
Record ID: CA-P-00205008
Captured: 2026-03-20 11:21:28 UTC
SHA-256: 60393e7848e5b9c3…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/figma/figma-terms-of-service/acceptable-use-restrictions/
Accessed: Sept. 8, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Low
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Figma's Acceptable Use Restrictions clause do?

Violating these restrictions can result in immediate account suspension or termination, so users should be familiar with what activities are prohibited.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Figma?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Figma.