Provision record
ElevenLabs · ElevenLabs Privacy Policy · View original document ↗

Voice Recording Collection and AI Training Use

High severity Medium confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Common · 290 of 352 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track ElevenLabs and get the diff the day its terms change.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Monitor governance changes for ElevenLabs Monitor emails you the same day this changes. The archive stays free.
Follow ElevenLabs →

Get the research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.

Document Record

What it is

The policy states that voice recordings submitted by users may be processed to train and improve ElevenLabs' AI models, subject to user account settings and applicable consent mechanisms.

This analysis describes what ElevenLabs's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This provision authorizes the use of user-submitted voice audio for AI model training, which creates obligations under GDPR lawful basis requirements and may trigger biometric consent statutes in Illinois, Texas, and Washington if voice recordings are characterized as biometric identifiers under those frameworks.

Interpretive note: The policy's reference to 'applicable consent choices' does not specify whether consent is obtained through opt-in or opt-out mechanisms, and the characterization of voice recordings as biometric data under state law depends on jurisdiction-specific definitions and enforcement posture.

Change history

modified May 21, 2026

Language simplified and narrowed to focus on submitted recordings only; added explicit reference to 'account settings and applicable consent choices' providing user control over AI training use.

View full change record →

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Under this clause, voice audio submitted to the ElevenLabs platform may be retained and used to train AI models. The agreement indicates that account settings may allow users to adjust these preferences, and applicable consent requirements apply depending on jurisdiction.

What you can do

⚠️ These actions may provide transparency or partial mitigation but may not fully address the underlying issue. Effectiveness varies by jurisdiction and individual circumstances.
  • Delete Your Data
    Email privacy@elevenlabs.io to request deletion of your voice recordings or to inquire about adjusting AI training data preferences. Describe the specific data you wish to have deleted.

How other platforms handle this

Roblox Medium

To stop us collecting your location information, you can update your device settings, stop using the Service, or uninstall our mobile apps.

Tinder Medium

If you choose to reveal any personal information about yourself to other users, you do so at your own risk. We strongly encourage you to use caution in disclosing any personal information online.

Skillshare Medium

When you are asked to provide information, you may decline to do so; but if you choose not to provide information that is necessary to provide some of our Services, you may not be able to use those Services.

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

ElevenLabs has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 20 platforms.

Follow ElevenLabs → Or get the research letter, free →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
We collect voice recordings and audio inputs you provide when using our Services. We may use voice data, including recordings you submit, to develop, train, and improve our AI models and voice synthesis technologies, subject to your account settings and applicable consent choices.

Excerpt from ElevenLabs's Privacy Policy

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

1. REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: This provision implicates GDPR (lawful basis for processing, and potentially Article 9 if voice data qualifies as biometric data), CCPA/CPRA (disclosure of training data uses and right to opt out of certain data uses), and state biometric privacy statutes including BIPA (Illinois), CUBI (Texas), and the Washington My Health MY Data Act if voice data is treated as biometric. Enforcement authorities include EU/UK data protection authorities, the California Privacy Protection Agency, and Illinois state courts under BIPA's private right of action. The assertion that voice data may be used for AI training may face constraint under GDPR if the lawful basis relied upon is legitimate interest rather than explicit consent for biometric processing. 2. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: High. The use of voice recordings for AI training is an area of active regulatory attention. BIPA carries a private right of action with statutory damages of $1,000 to $5,000 per violation, and several courts have addressed whether AI voice processing falls within its scope. GDPR enforcement actions concerning AI training data have been initiated in multiple EU jurisdictions. The combination of voice data collection and AI training use creates layered exposure across multiple regulatory regimes. 3. JURISDICTION FLAGS: Illinois presents the highest exposure given BIPA's private right of action and broad definition of biometric identifiers that may encompass voice prints. Texas and Washington have analogous statutes with attorney general enforcement. EU and UK users are protected by GDPR and UK GDPR requirements that may require explicit consent for biometric data processing. California's CPRA imposes additional sensitive personal information handling requirements that may apply to voice data. 4. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Enterprise or API customers integrating ElevenLabs into their own products should evaluate whether downstream collection of end-user voice data through ElevenLabs APIs triggers their own biometric consent obligations. Data processing agreements with ElevenLabs should specify the scope of AI training uses and whether customer-submitted voice data is excluded from model training by contract. 5. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Compliance teams should audit the consent architecture governing AI training uses of voice data, confirm that account-level opt-out mechanisms are operationally implemented and documented, assess whether a biometric data retention and destruction schedule is required under applicable state law, and evaluate whether the policy's disclosure of AI training uses satisfies CCPA data use disclosure requirements at the point of collection.

Stay ahead of the changes

Full institutional analysis

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Applicable agencies

  • FTC
    The FTC has jurisdiction over consumer data practices and unfair or deceptive trade practices related to AI training data uses.
    File a complaint →
  • State AG
    State attorneys general in Illinois, Texas, Washington, and California have enforcement authority over biometric and sensitive personal data statutes relevant to voice recording processing.
    File a complaint →

Applicable regulations

EU AI Act
European Union
CCPA/CPRA
California, USA
Colorado AI Act
US-CO
Connecticut Data Privacy Act Amendments
US-CT
EU AI Act - High Risk Provisions
EU
FTC Act Section 5
United States Federal
GDPR
European Union
Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act
US-IN
Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act
US-KY
Universal Opt-Out Mechanism Expansion 2026
US

Provision details

Document information
Document
ElevenLabs Privacy Policy
Entity
ElevenLabs
Document last updated
May 12, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 21, 2026
Last verified
May 21, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-013068
Document ID
CA-D-00834
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
9275d285aa3d9e34e3fda22987a999e8a89717081c303261ff13981c3172e942
Analysis generated
May 21, 2026 04:41 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: ElevenLabs
Document: ElevenLabs Privacy Policy
Record ID: CA-P-013068
Captured: 2026-05-21 04:41:17 UTC
SHA-256: 9275d285aa3d9e34…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/elevenlabs/elevenlabs-privacy-policy/provision/CA-P-013068/voice-recording-collection-and-ai-training-use/
Accessed: July 28, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Related Analysis

Stay ahead of the changes

Governance intelligence across arbitration, AI governance, data rights, indemnification, and retention

Provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, and regulatory mapping built from archived source documents and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does ElevenLabs's Voice Recording Collection and AI Training Use clause do?

This provision authorizes the use of user-submitted voice audio for AI model training, which creates obligations under GDPR lawful basis requirements and may trigger biometric consent statutes in Illinois, Texas, and Washington if voice recordings are characterized as biometric identifiers under those frameworks.

How does this clause affect you?

Under this clause, voice audio submitted to the ElevenLabs platform may be retained and used to train AI models. The agreement indicates that account settings may allow users to adjust these preferences, and applicable consent requirements apply depending on jurisdiction.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 290 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with ElevenLabs?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by ElevenLabs.